Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Campo, CA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded D — but Copper was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

1 contaminant over a legal limit
6.9 ppb lead, 90th percentile
17 unresolved violations
1K people served by 3 water systems

PWSID CA3700923 · moderate data confidence · private utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
D 48.1 / 100

#617 of 690California cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Campo water safe?

Campo's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of D (48.1/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 1,133 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

Copper is over its legal limit

Measured at 1.45 mg/L against the EPA Action Level of 1.3 mg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
Context

1K people, 3 systems

All figures on this page come from federal EPA compliance and testing data for the systems serving this city.

See the systems ↓
Keep watching

14 violations in the last five years

Recent compliance history is the best predictor of future problems — the year-by-year record is below.

See the record ↓

Campo's drinking water received a grade of D (48.1 out of 100), indicating poor water quality. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 1,133 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 6.9 ppb (90th percentile), which is within EPA limits but above recommended levels. This system has not yet been tested for PFAS under the EPA UCMR 5 program. The system has 207 violations on record, including 74 health-based violations. 17 remain unresolved.

Campo ranks #617 out of 690 cities in California for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. Campo relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. While lead levels are within EPA limits, they are above the recommended 5 ppb threshold that health organizations consider ideal. A point-of-use filter adds an extra layer of protection. As a small community water system, Campo may have fewer resources for advanced treatment technologies and infrastructure upgrades compared to larger utilities. The system has seen 14 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 48.1/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
6.1 / 45F
Lead & CopperLead at 6.9 ppb (90th percentile).
12 / 20C
ContaminantsPFAS + legacy contaminant analysis.
17 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Campo's water

Every contaminant flagged in Campo, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

2 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over Limit — EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L

Exceeds the EPA action level. Copper leaches from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking, and consider a certified filter.
Exceeds Limit What to do →
2 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 2 detected · not yet tested for PFAS under UCMR 5

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 6.9 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 1.45 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Campo's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 207 violations on record, including 74 health-based violations. 17 remain unresolved.

4 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

5 health-based in 10 yrs 13 monitoring & paperwork 6 still unresolved
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Campo's water quality assessment. Grade: D (48.1/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Nitrate.Resolved
Violation2 drinking water violations recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS.Open
Violation2 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
DisasterSEVERE STORM AND FLOODINGFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4758). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
DisasterSEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDESFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4683). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
0204060EPA action level · 15 ppb1993 — 8 ppb1994 — 8 ppb1995 — 5 ppb1998 — 10 ppb2000 — 6.5 ppb2001 — 6.5 ppb2002 — 44 ppb2004 — 7.7 ppb2007 — 4 ppb2010 — 19 ppb2011 — 0 ppb2012 — 0 ppb2013 — 0 ppb2016 — 6 ppb2017 — 5 ppb2019 — 0 ppb2022 — 0.70 ppb2025 — 8.6 ppb2026 — 6.9 ppb86.9199320002007201320222026

Down 1.1 ppb since 1993. Latest reading: 6.9 ppb (2026) — 46% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L · lower is better
01234EPA action level · 1.3 mg/L2000 — 1.7 mg/L2001 — 2.9 mg/L2010 — 1.7 mg/L2016 — 1.5 mg/L1.71.52000200120102016

Down 0.25 mg/L since 2000. The latest reading (1.5 mg/L, 2016) is over the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Campo's water comes from

Campo's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

3 systems

3 water systems, operated under private ownership.

Delivery

1,133 people

Residents served across Campo's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by private ownership and serves approximately 1,133 people through 3 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
LAKE MORENA'S OAK SHORES MWC CA3700923 670 Groundwater
Campo Church Road System (HUD Homes) 090605045 400 Groundwater
South Campo 090600059 63 Groundwater

Water bodies near Campo

Campo C Nr Campo · river

These water bodies shape the regional watershed and can indirectly affect groundwater quality.

05Pressure on Campo's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

1 facility within 10 miles reported 0 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

US NAVY CAMP MICHAEL MONSOOR - LA POSTA (RANGES) (PART) 0 lb · 3.8 mi

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

10 federal disaster declarations on record for San Diego County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

SEVERE STORM AND FLOODING Feb 2024 · DR-4758
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES Jan 2023 · DR-4683
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, AND MUDSLIDES Jan 2023 · DR-3591

06How Campo compares

Scores for nearby California cities on one line, with the average marked.

Oakland
77.9 · B
Campo (this city)
48.1 · D
Los Angeles
42.8 · F
San Diego
39.7 · F
Sacramento
31.2 · F
San Jose
28 · F

dashed line = California average (57/100)

Campo scores 48.1/100below the California average of 57/100. It outscores 5 of 10 nearby cities. Full California rankings →

San Diego water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Campo's water — not generic advice.

Because of lead

Filter drinking & cooking water

NSF-certified water filter. Lead detected at 6.9 ppb

Compare tested filters →
Because lead was detected

Flush taps & check your service line

Lead leaches from pipes as water sits. Run cold water 30 seconds before drinking (especially mornings), and ask the utility whether your address still has a lead service line.

Lead risks explained →
Stay informed

Watch for Campo alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Campo, CA tap water safe to drink?

Campo's water quality earned a grade of D (48.1/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #617 out of 690 cities tested in California.

What contaminants are in Campo's water?

Lead was measured at 6.9 ppb (90th percentile). 207 violations are on record.

How is Campo's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Campo?

While lead levels are within EPA limits, a filter adds extra protection. Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Campo's water come from?

Campo's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 3 water systems serving approximately 1,133 residents.

What health violations has Campo's water system had?

Campo has 74 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in January 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 17 violations remain unresolved.

Is Campo's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Campo uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 207 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Campo's water compare to other cities?

Campo ranks #617 out of 690 cities in California (better than 11% of state cities) and #13235 out of 15382 cities nationally (14th percentile). The grade of D reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Campo, CA: Median household income $55,529 · median home value $311,161 · median age 33.3 · 72.4% homeowners · 11.3% college educated. Service area: 1 ZIP code across San Diego.
Show ZIP codes 91906
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.