WaterVerge

Is Battle Mountain, NV Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded F — but Lead was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓

4K residents served 2 water systems PWSID: NV0000008
Overall Score
33.2 / 100
Violations
35 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Groundwater
#65 of 66 in Nevada Top 99% nationally
Local Government
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
FGRADE
Water Quality Grade
33.2/100
waterverge.com
F 33.2/100

Battle Mountain, NV — Water Quality Report

Battle Mountain's drinking water received a grade of F (33.2 out of 100), indicating failing water quality. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 3,830 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 17.0 ppb (90th percentile), which exceeds the EPA action level of 15 ppb. UCMR 5 testing detected 1 PFAS compound in the water supply.

The system has 326 violations on record, including 33 health-based violations. 35 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Battle Mountain's water

Battle Mountain ranks #65 out of 66 cities in Nevada for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state.

Battle Mountain relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter.

Lead levels exceed the EPA action level of 15 ppb, which typically indicates aging lead service lines or lead solder in the distribution system. An NSF 53-certified filter is strongly recommended for drinking and cooking water.

The system has seen 29 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
33.2 out of 100 Grade F
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
0/45
F
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
6/20
F
Lead at 17.0 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
14.2/20
C
1 PFAS compound detected.
Compliance
8/10
B
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
5/5
A
Water source: Groundwater.
Water Safety

Is Battle Mountain, NV water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

Battle Mountain's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of F (33.2/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 3,830 residents using groundwater (wells).

35
Active Violations
17.0 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
1 compound
PFAS Detected

Recent water quality updates for Battle Mountain

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

PFAS
1 PFAS "forever chemical" compound detected

Detected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Battle Mountain's water quality assessment. Grade: F (33.2/100).

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Arsenic.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Battle Mountain's water supply.

Lead Exceeds Limit
Detected: 17.0 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Exceeds EPA action level. Lead service line replacement and point-of-use filtration recommended.

PFAS (1 compound) Elevated
Detected: Highest: lithium at 54.0000 µg/L Limit: 0.004 µg/L (EPA MCL)

Detected but within current EPA limits. PFAS do not break down in the environment and can accumulate in the body over time. An activated carbon filter can reduce exposure.

Violation history

Battle Mountain's water system has 326 total violations on record, including 33 health-based violations. 35 remain unresolved. 29 violations were issued in the last 5 years.

RPTMRTTOtherMONMCL
Most recent violations:
Dec 2025 Revised Total Coliform Rule Open
Nov 2025 Revised Total Coliform Rule Open
Oct 2025 Arsenic Resolved
Jul 2025 Lead and Copper Rule Open
Jul 2025 Lead and Copper Rule Resolved

Where does Battle Mountain's water come from?

Battle Mountain's drinking water comes from groundwater (wells), supplied by 2 water systems serving approximately 3,830 people. Groundwater is generally less susceptible to surface contamination but can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate.

What Battle Mountain residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: NSF 53-certified pitcher or under-sink filter. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Battle Mountain's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Flush your taps

Run cold water for 30 seconds before drinking, especially in the morning. Lead and copper leach from household plumbing when water sits in pipes.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Over Limit
17.0 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · +13% over limit
Exceeds LimitFilter: NSF-53
lithium
PFAS / Forever Chemical
Near MCL
54.0000 µg/L
EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L · +20% over limit
Detected
Lithium
Inorganic
Detected
54.0 µg/L
State screening level: 60 µg/L · 90% of limit
DetectedNo federal MCLUCMR 5 Data (2023–2025)
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
1
Detected
0
Exceed EPA MCL
Compliance Record

Violation summary

326
Total violations
33
Health-based
35
Active / unresolved
Dec 2025
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

326 Total
35 Active
33 Health-based
291 Resolved
2 SNC
Violations by category
Volatile Organic Chemicals
63
Synthetic Organic Chemicals
62
Total Coliform Rule
58
Arsenic Rule
43
Radionuclides and Revised Rad Rule
24
Dec 2025 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Nov 2025 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Jul 2025 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2025 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Sep 2024 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Apr 2024 Active
Groundwater Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Apr 2024 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Feb 2024 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Feb 2023 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2022 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Sep 2022 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Jun 2021 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Jun 2021 Active
Groundwater Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Nov 2020 Active
Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Jul 2019 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Apr 2016 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2011 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Showing 20 of 326 violations
Industrial pollution

Top industrial polluters within 10 miles of Battle Mountain

Industrial polluters nearby

Reported releases to surface water by facilities near Battle Mountain, ranked by pounds discharged annually.

FacilityTop chemicalTo surface water (lbs/yr)Distance
NEVADA GOLD MINES LLC - PHOENIX MINE
Metal Mining · BARRICK NEVADA HOLDING LLC
BATTLE MOUNTAIN, NV89820
0.9 mi
AU-REKA GOLD CORPORATION - MCCOY COVE
Metal Mining · TTM TECHNOLOGIES INC
BATTLE MOUNTAIN, NV89820
0.6 mi

Source: EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) 2023

Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D2 — severe drought

Lander County is currently in D2 (severe drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

3
Weeks at D2+ (current streak)
25.8%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)
3
Weeks at D2+ (last 5y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in Battle Mountain's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🚰
For Lead
Reverse Osmosis or NSF 53-Certified Pitcher
Lead level (17.0 ppb) exceeds the EPA action level of 15 ppb
Read our guide →
🧪
For PFAS
Reverse Osmosis or Activated Carbon Block
1 PFAS compound detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 17.0 15 ppb Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 54.000 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has decreased by 5.0 ppb from 1992 (5.0 ppb) to 2025 (0.0 ppb).
Contaminant Rankings

See how Battle Mountain compares by contaminant

Explore where Battle Mountain ranks among all Nevada cities for specific contaminants.

Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Groundwater
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
3,830
Water Systems
2
Water Source

Where Battle Mountain's water comes from

Groundwater

Battle Mountain's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals.

Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 3,830 people through 2 water systems.

Infrastructure

Water systems serving Battle Mountain

System Name PWSID Population Source
LANDER CO SEWER AND WATER DIST 1 BM NV0000008 3,635 GW
Battle Mountain 093200364 195 GW
Regional Comparison

How Battle Mountain compares

Full Nevada rankings →

Battle Mountain's score of 33.2/100 is below the average of 57/100 among major Nevada cities. It outscores 1 of 10 nearby cities. 9 of 10 nearby cities score higher.

Battle Mountain (this city)
33.2
Las Vegas
39.8
Reno
29.3
Reno
72.2
Henderson
51.8
Nevada avg
57
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Battle Mountain, NV tap water safe to drink?

Battle Mountain's water quality earned a grade of F (33.2/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #65 out of 66 cities tested in Nevada.

What contaminants are in Battle Mountain's water?

Lead was measured at 17.0 ppb (90th percentile). 1 PFAS compound was detected. 326 violations are on record.

How is Battle Mountain's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Battle Mountain?

Yes — lead levels exceed the EPA action level of 15 ppb. We recommend an NSF 53-certified filter or reverse osmosis system. PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does Battle Mountain's water come from?

Battle Mountain's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 2 water systems serving approximately 3,830 residents.

What health violations has Battle Mountain's water system had?

Battle Mountain has 33 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in December 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 35 violations remain unresolved.

Is Battle Mountain's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Battle Mountain uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 326 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Battle Mountain's water compare to other cities?

Battle Mountain ranks #65 out of 66 cities in Nevada (better than 2% of state cities) and #15608 out of 15744 cities nationally (1th percentile). The grade of F reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.