Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Ashland, NH Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded C+ — but Lead and Copper were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

2 contaminants over a legal limit
31.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile
7 unresolved violations
2K people served by 3 water systems

PWSID NH0101010 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
C 65.3 / 100

#57 of 98New Hampshire cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Ashland water safe?

Ashland's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of C+ (65.3/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 1,815 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

Lead is over its legal limit

Measured at 31.0 ppb against the EPA Action Level of 15 ppb. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
Context

2K people, 3 systems

All figures on this page come from federal EPA compliance and testing data for the systems serving this city.

See the systems ↓
Keep watching

1 violation in the last five years

Recent compliance history is the best predictor of future problems — the year-by-year record is below.

See the record ↓

Ashland's drinking water received a grade of C+ (65.3 out of 100), indicating fair water quality. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 1,815 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 31.0 ppb (90th percentile), which exceeds the EPA action level of 15 ppb. This system has not yet been tested for PFAS under the EPA UCMR 5 program. The system has 105 violations on record, including 10 health-based violations. 7 remain unresolved.

Ashland ranks #57 out of 98 cities in New Hampshire for water quality, placing it below average in the state. Ashland relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. Lead levels exceed the EPA action level of 15 ppb, which typically indicates aging lead service lines or lead solder in the distribution system. An NSF 53-certified filter is strongly recommended for drinking and cooking water. As a small community water system, Ashland may have fewer resources for advanced treatment technologies and infrastructure upgrades compared to larger utilities.

How the 65.3/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
37.2 / 45B
Lead & CopperLead at 31.0 ppb (90th percentile).
0 / 20F
ContaminantsPFAS + legacy contaminant analysis.
15.1 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Ashland's water

Every contaminant flagged in Ashland, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

4 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over Limit — EPA Action Level: 15 ppb

Exceeds the EPA action level. Lead enters at the service line, not the treatment plant — your address matters more than the city average. Lead service line replacement and an NSF 53-certified point-of-use filter are recommended.
Exceeds LimitFilter: NSF-53 What to do →
Manganese Inorganic
29.4 µg/L 59% of limit
4 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 4 detected · not yet tested for PFAS under UCMR 5

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 31.0 15 ppb Inorganic Over Limit
Copper (90th percentile) 2.18 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Ashland's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 105 violations on record, including 10 health-based violations. 7 remain unresolved.

9 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

1 monitoring & paperwork 1 still unresolved
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Ashland's water quality assessment. Grade: C+ (65.3/100).
DisasterSEVERE STORMS AND FLOODINGFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4740). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Combined Radium (-226 and -228).Resolved
Violation2 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: Public Notice.Open
DisasterHURRICANE SANDYFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4095). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
01020304050EPA action level · 15 ppb1993 — 23 ppb1998 — 24 ppb1999 — 26 ppb2000 — 40 ppb2001 — 18 ppb2002 — 20 ppb2012 — 31 ppb23311993199920012012

Up 8 ppb since 1993. The latest reading (31 ppb, 2012) is over the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L · lower is better
0123EPA action level · 1.3 mg/L1998 — 1.7 mg/L1999 — 2.0 mg/L2000 — 2.2 mg/L1.72.2199819992000

Up 0.51 mg/L since 1998. The latest reading (2.2 mg/L, 2000) is over the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Ashland's water comes from

Ashland's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

3 systems

3 water systems, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

1,815 people

Residents served across Ashland's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 1,815 people through 3 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
ASHLAND WATER DEPT NH0101010 1,525 Groundwater
ROPEWALK SERVICES NH0102010 290 Groundwater
VILLAGE AT RIVERBEND NH0102020 258 Groundwater

Water bodies near Ashland

Pemigewasset River · river Smith River · river

These water bodies shape the regional watershed and can indirectly affect groundwater quality.

05Pressure on Ashland's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

1 facility within 10 miles reported 4 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

FREUDENBERG-NOK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES — zinc compounds 4 lb · 9.6 mi

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

10 federal disaster declarations on record for Grafton County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING Sep 2023 · DR-4740
HURRICANE SANDY Nov 2012 · DR-4095
HURRICANE SANDY Oct 2012 · DR-3360

06How Ashland compares

Scores for nearby New Hampshire cities on one line, with the average marked.

Keene
89.2 · A-
Nashua
88.7 · A-
Portsmouth
80.7 · B+
Ashland (this city)
65.3 · C+
Concord
51.3 · D+
Manchester
50.9 · D+

dashed line = New Hampshire average (66/100)

Ashland scores 65.3/100on par with the New Hampshire average of 66/100. It outscores 5 of 10 nearby cities. Full New Hampshire rankings →

Grafton water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Ashland's water — not generic advice.

Because of lead

Filter drinking & cooking water

NSF 53-certified pitcher or under-sink filter. Lead level (31.0 ppb) exceeds the EPA action level of 15 ppb

Compare tested filters →
Because lead was detected

Flush taps & check your service line

Lead leaches from pipes as water sits. Run cold water 30 seconds before drinking (especially mornings), and ask the utility whether your address still has a lead service line.

Lead risks explained →
Stay informed

Watch for Ashland alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Ashland, NH tap water safe to drink?

Ashland's water quality earned a grade of C+ (65.3/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #57 out of 98 cities tested in New Hampshire.

What contaminants are in Ashland's water?

Lead was measured at 31.0 ppb (90th percentile). 105 violations are on record.

How is Ashland's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Ashland?

Yes — lead levels exceed the EPA action level of 15 ppb. We recommend an NSF 53-certified filter or reverse osmosis system. Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Ashland's water come from?

Ashland's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 3 water systems serving approximately 1,815 residents.

What health violations has Ashland's water system had?

Ashland has 10 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in October 2021. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 7 violations remain unresolved.

Is Ashland's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Ashland uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 105 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Ashland's water compare to other cities?

Ashland ranks #57 out of 98 cities in New Hampshire (better than 42% of state cities) and #11354 out of 15382 cities nationally (26th percentile). The grade of C+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Ashland, NH: Ashland is a town in Grafton County, New Hampshire, United States. The population was 1,938 at the 2020 census, down from 2,076 at the 2010 census. Located near the geographical center of the state, Ashland is home to Scribner-Fellows State Forest. Median household income $53,367 · median home value $174,146 · median age 32.3 · 61.1% homeowners · 26.3% college educated. Wikipedia → Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.