Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Ardmore, TN Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded F — but Copper and PFOS were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

2 contaminants over a legal limit
4.6 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
2 unresolved violations
4K people served by 1 water system

PWSID AL0001420 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
F 39.5 / 100

#298 of 299Tennessee cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Ardmore water safe?

Ardmore's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of F (39.5/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 3,903 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

Copper is over its legal limit

Measured at 4.13 mg/L against the EPA Action Level of 1.3 mg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 4.6 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

135 violations in the last five years

Recent compliance history is the best predictor of future problems — the year-by-year record is below.

See the record ↓

Ardmore's drinking water received a grade of F (39.5 out of 100), indicating failing water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 3,903 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 4.6 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 7 PFAS compounds, with levels exceeding EPA maximum contaminant levels in the water supply. The system has 205 violations on record, including 0 health-based violations. 2 remain unresolved.

Ardmore ranks #298 out of 299 cities in Tennessee for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. Ardmore relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. Of particular concern: PFAS "forever chemical" levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels. These synthetic compounds don't break down naturally and require specialized filtration such as reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon. The system has seen 135 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 39.5/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
0 / 45F
Lead & CopperLead at 4.6 ppb (90th percentile).
14 / 20C
Contaminants7 PFAS compounds detected.
10.5 / 20D
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
10 / 10A
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Ardmore's water

Every contaminant flagged in Ardmore, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

3 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over Limit — EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L

Exceeds the EPA action level. Copper leaches from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking, and consider a certified filter.
Exceeds Limit What to do →
32 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 9 detected · 2 PFAS over EPA MCL · PFAS hazard index 4.70 (above the 1.0 threshold)

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 4.6 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 4.13 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA 0.007 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFBS 0.004 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA 0.004 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFHxS 0.003 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA 0.006 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFOS 0.013 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFPeA 0.004 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Ardmore's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 205 violations on record, including 0 health-based violations. 2 remain unresolved.

6 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

148 monitoring & paperwork
PFAS7 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detectedPFAS levels exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or activated carbon filtration recommended.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Ardmore's water quality assessment. Grade: F (39.5/100).
Violation21 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene, cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene, Xylenes, Total.Resolved
Violation29 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: BHC-GAMMA, Methoxychlor, Dalapon.Resolved
Violation21 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene, Xylenes, Total, o-Dichlorobenzene.Resolved
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
02004006008001000EPA action level · 15 ppb1993 — 26 ppb1994 — 6 ppb1995 — 3 ppb1996 — 5 ppb1999 — 4.6 ppb2002 — 840 ppb2005 — 2.8 ppb2008 — 5 ppb2011 — 6 ppb2014 — 5 ppb2017 — 5 ppb2020 — 2 ppb2023 — 4.6 ppb264.619931996200520142023

Down 21 ppb since 1993. Latest reading: 4.6 ppb (2023) — 31% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L

4.1mg/L(1993)

One sampling round on record — 318% of the 1.3mg/L EPA action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Ardmore's water comes from

Ardmore's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

1 system

1 water system, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

3,903 people

Residents served across Ardmore's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 3,903 people through 1 water system.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
ARDMORE WATER SYSTEM AL0001420 3,903 Groundwater

05Pressure on Ardmore's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

2 facilities within 10 miles reported 55 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

SNAP-ON TOOLS ELKMONT MANUFACTURING — zinc compounds 54 lb · 9.2 mi
WOLVERINE TUBE INC — copper 1 lb · 0.6 mi

06How Ardmore compares

Scores for nearby Tennessee cities on one line, with the average marked.

Murfreesboro
80.6 · B+
Clarksville
75.5 · B
Nashville
69 · C+
Memphis
66.2 · C+
Knoxville
55 · C-
Ardmore (this city)
39.5 · F

dashed line = Tennessee average (73/100)

Ardmore scores 39.5/100below the Tennessee average of 73/100. Full Tennessee rankings →

Limestone water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Ardmore's water — not generic advice.

Because of pfas

Filter drinking & cooking water

Reverse osmosis system. PFAS compounds exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels

Compare tested filters →
Because lead was detected

Flush taps & check your service line

Lead leaches from pipes as water sits. Run cold water 30 seconds before drinking (especially mornings), and ask the utility whether your address still has a lead service line.

Lead risks explained →
Stay informed

Watch for Ardmore alerts

We refresh EPA data monthly and surface new violations, advisories, and boil-water notices for your county on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Ardmore, TN tap water safe to drink?

Ardmore's water quality earned a grade of F (39.5/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #298 out of 299 cities tested in Tennessee.

What contaminants are in Ardmore's water?

Lead was measured at 4.6 ppb (90th percentile). 7 PFAS compounds were detected. 205 violations are on record.

How is Ardmore's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Ardmore?

PFAS compounds exceed EPA limits — a reverse osmosis or activated carbon filter is recommended.

Where does Ardmore's water come from?

Ardmore's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 3,903 residents.

Is Ardmore's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Ardmore uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 205 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

Why does Ardmore have so many PFAS compounds in its water?

7 different PFAS "forever chemical" compounds were detected in Ardmore's water supply during UCMR 5 testing. PFAS contamination often originates from proximity to military installations (AFFF firefighting foam), airports, industrial manufacturing sites, or wastewater treatment facilities. Some levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels — a reverse osmosis or NSF-certified activated carbon filter is strongly recommended.

How does Ardmore's water compare to other cities?

Ardmore ranks #298 out of 299 cities in Tennessee (better than 0% of state cities) and #14908 out of 15382 cities nationally (3th percentile). The grade of F reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
Service area: 1 ZIP code across Limestone.
Show ZIP codes 38449
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.