Fillmore Water Quality Report
7 cities ranked · Average grade: A- · Minnesota
Avg Score
89.2
Cities Ranked
7
Health Violations
1
PFAS Detected
0
89.2
County avg score
7
Cities ranked
100%
A or B grade
0%
D or F grade
1
Health violations
0
PFAS detected
Grade Distribution
How Fillmore cities scored
A
5
71%
Excellent
B
2
29%
Good
C
0
0%
Fair
D
0
0%
Poor
F
0
0%
Failing
Comparison
County vs Minnesota average
▲ 1.7 pts above state average
City Map
Water quality across Fillmore
Each dot is a city, colored by grade. Click any city to view its full report.
Highlights
Top & bottom cities in Fillmore
Worst cities
County context
99.6%
of residents on fluoridated water (CDC, 2020)
0
lbs/yr to surface water · top 10 TRI facilities
Industrial pollution
Top industrial polluters in Fillmore
Industrial polluters nearby
Facilities reporting the most surface-water releases in Fillmore, 2023.
| Facility | Top chemical | To surface water (lbs/yr) |
|---|---|---|
STRONGWELL - CHATFIELD DIV CHATFIELD, MN55923 | — | — |
POET BIOREFNING - PRESTON LLC PRESTON, MN55965 | — | — |
PRESTON PROTEIN PRODUCTS PRESTON, MN55965 | — | — |
Source: EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) 2023
Full Rankings
All 7 cities in Fillmore
| # | City | Grade | Score | Score | Population | Violations | Issues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mabel | A+ | 96.3 | 715 | 5 | Unresolved | |
| 2 | Spring Valley | A | 94.3 | 3K | 6 | Unresolved | |
| 3 | Lanesboro | A | 91.5 | 727 | 4 | Health Unresolved | |
| 4 | Harmony | A- | 89.6 | 1K | 3 | Unresolved | |
| 5 | Chatfield | A- | 87.5 | 3K | 5 | Unresolved | |
| 6 | Preston | B+ | 84 | 1K | 25 | Unresolved | |
| 7 | Rushford | B+ | 81.1 | 2K | 6 | Unresolved |