Chickasaw Water Quality Report
3 cities ranked · Average grade: A · Iowa
Avg Score
90.9
Cities Ranked
3
Health Violations
0
PFAS Detected
1
90.9
County avg score
3
Cities ranked
100%
A or B grade
0%
D or F grade
0
Health violations
1
PFAS detected
Grade Distribution
How Chickasaw cities scored
A
3
100%
Excellent
B
0
0%
Good
C
0
0%
Fair
D
0
0%
Poor
F
0
0%
Failing
Comparison
County vs Iowa average
▲ 3.4 pts above state average
City Map
Water quality across Chickasaw
Each dot is a city, colored by grade. Click any city to view its full report.
Highlights
Top & bottom cities in Chickasaw
Best cities
Worst cities
County context
23.2%
of residents on fluoridated water (CDC, 2020)
0
lbs/yr to surface water · top 10 TRI facilities
Industrial pollution
Top industrial polluters in Chickasaw
Industrial polluters nearby
Facilities reporting the most surface-water releases in Chickasaw, 2023.
| Facility | Top chemical | To surface water (lbs/yr) |
|---|---|---|
TRIMARK CORP NEW HAMPTON, IA50659 | — | — |
AFINITAS NEW HAMPTON, IA50659 | — | — |
ATEK METAL TECHNOLOGIES NEW HAMPTON, IA50659 | — | — |
HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC LAWLER, IA52154 | — | — |
Source: EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) 2023
Full Rankings
All 3 cities in Chickasaw
| # | City | Grade | Score | Score | Population | Violations | Issues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Hampton | A | 92.2 | 3K | 6 | Unresolved | |
| 2 | Fredericksburg | A | 91.1 | 987 | 7 | Unresolved | |
| 3 | Nashua | A- | 89.5 | 2K | 21 | Unresolved |