WaterVerge

Head-to-head water quality

Columbus, OH vs Oakland, CA

Side-by-side water quality comparison: Columbus (Grade F) vs Oakland (Grade B). Lead, PFAS, violations, and source-water contamination

Score breakdown

Each factor is shown as raw points (out of the maximum). Higher = better.

Factor
Columbus
Oakland
Better
Violations subscore / 45
0.0
35.1
Oakland
Lead/Copper subscore / 20
16.0
16.0
Tie
Contaminant subscore / 20
7.4
14.8
Oakland
Compliance subscore / 10
8.0
8.0
Tie
Source subscore / 5
4.0
4.0
Tie

Lead & copper at the tap

Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) 90th-percentile readings — the value that 10% of sampled homes exceed.

Factor
Columbus
Oakland
Better
Lead 90th-percentile (latest) · EPA action level: 15 µg/L
0.0 µg/L
0.0 µg/L
Columbus
Copper 90th-percentile (latest) · EPA action level: 1.3 mg/L
46.0 mg/L
1.8 mg/L
Oakland

PFAS — "forever chemicals"

UCMR 5 testing, 2023–2025. Federal MCLs: PFOA + PFOS = 4 ng/L; HFPO-DA = 10 ng/L.

Factor
Columbus
Oakland
Better
PFAS analytes detected
7 of 30
1 of 30
Oakland
PFAS exceeds federal MCL
Yes
No
Oakland
PFAS hazard index · Sum of (max/MCL) across detected analytes; > 1 indicates exceedance
1.80
Columbus

Violation history

SDWA enforcement actions — fewer is better.

Factor
Columbus
Oakland
Better
Violations (last 5 years)
35
2
Oakland
Health-based violations (total)
56
13
Oakland
Unresolved violations
89
6
Oakland

Other contaminants tested

UCMR rounds 1–4 + UCMR 5 lithium. Maxima where data exists; "—" means not tested.

Factor
Columbus
Oakland
Better
Chromium-6 (max)
0.35 µg/L
0.22 µg/L
Oakland
HAA5 (avg)
16.32 µg/L
34.22 µg/L
Columbus
Manganese (max)
0.48 µg/L
12.70 µg/L
Columbus
Strontium (max)
1300.00 µg/L
320.00 µg/L
Oakland
1,4-Dioxane (max)
0.12 µg/L
Columbus
NDMA (max)
3.30 ng/L
Oakland
Vanadium (max)
0.69 µg/L
2.40 µg/L
Columbus
Chlorate (max)
370.00 µg/L
480.00 µg/L
Columbus
Molybdenum (max)
12.00 µg/L
1.20 µg/L
Oakland

Industrial proximity

Superfund National Priorities List + Toxic Release Inventory facilities within 10 miles of the city centroid.

Factor
Columbus
Oakland
Better
Superfund sites within 10 mi
1
3
Columbus
TRI lbs to surface water within 10 mi (2023)
103
45
Oakland

System size & source

Factor
Columbus
Oakland
Population served
1.3M
1.4M
Water source
Surface water
Surface water
Number of water systems
15
5

See the full reports

Frequently asked

Which has better water — Columbus or Oakland?
Oakland, CA scores higher (77.9 vs 35.5) on WaterVerge's 100-point methodology, earning a Grade B compared to Columbus's Grade F. The score combines violation history, lead and copper levels, contaminant testing, monitoring compliance, and source-water type.
How is the WaterVerge water quality score calculated?
The grade combines five subscores: violation history (45 pts, weighted by recency and health-based severity), lead/copper 90th-percentile vs EPA action levels (20 pts), contaminant testing including PFAS, chromium-6, HAA5, NDMA, perchlorate, and Superfund/TRI proximity (20 pts), monitoring compliance (10 pts), and water-source-type risk (5 pts). Full methodology at /about/methodology.
Where does this water quality data come from?
From the EPA's public records: the SDWIS bulk download (violations + system info), UCMR rounds 1–5 (unregulated contaminant testing including PFAS, chromium-6, HAA5, NDMA, perchlorate, vanadium, lithium), the EPA Toxic Release Inventory (industrial polluters), the Superfund National Priorities List, the USGS Powell Domestic-Well Database (private-well chemistry), and the CDC Community Water Fluoridation system. Data is refreshed quarterly.