Head-to-head water quality
Bryn Mawr, PA vs Charlotte, NC
Side-by-side water quality comparison: Bryn Mawr (Grade F) vs Charlotte (Grade F). Lead, PFAS, violations, and source-water contamination
Score breakdown
Each factor is shown as raw points (out of the maximum). Higher = better.
Factor
Bryn Mawr
Charlotte
Better
Violations subscore / 45
0.0
0.0
Tie
Lead/Copper subscore / 20
16.0
16.0
Tie
Contaminant subscore / 20
4.2
8.4
Charlotte
Compliance subscore / 10
10.0
8.0
Bryn Mawr
Source subscore / 5
4.0
4.0
Tie
Lead & copper at the tap
Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) 90th-percentile readings — the value that 10% of sampled homes exceed.
Factor
Bryn Mawr
Charlotte
Better
Lead 90th-percentile (latest) · EPA action level: 15 µg/L
0.0 µg/L
0.0 µg/L
Bryn Mawr
Copper 90th-percentile (latest) · EPA action level: 1.3 mg/L
1.4 mg/L
2.8 mg/L
Bryn Mawr
PFAS — "forever chemicals"
UCMR 5 testing, 2023–2025. Federal MCLs: PFOA + PFOS = 4 ng/L; HFPO-DA = 10 ng/L.
Factor
Bryn Mawr
Charlotte
Better
PFAS analytes detected
10 of 30
7 of 30
Charlotte
PFAS exceeds federal MCL
Yes
Yes
Tie
PFAS hazard index · Sum of (max/MCL) across detected analytes; > 1 indicates exceedance
9.43
1.35
Charlotte
Violation history
SDWA enforcement actions — fewer is better.
Factor
Bryn Mawr
Charlotte
Better
Violations (last 5 years)
147
56
Charlotte
Health-based violations (total)
36
47
Bryn Mawr
Unresolved violations
58
218
Bryn Mawr
Other contaminants tested
UCMR rounds 1–4 + UCMR 5 lithium. Maxima where data exists; "—" means not tested.
Factor
Bryn Mawr
Charlotte
Better
Chromium-6 (max)
2.60 µg/L
0.12 µg/L
Charlotte
HAA5 (avg)
25.99 µg/L
17.71 µg/L
Charlotte
Manganese (max)
81.00 µg/L
121.00 µg/L
Bryn Mawr
Strontium (max)
817.00 µg/L
35.80 µg/L
Charlotte
1,4-Dioxane (max)
2.20 µg/L
—
Bryn Mawr
NDMA (max)
15.00 ng/L
—
Bryn Mawr
Vanadium (max)
2.10 µg/L
0.75 µg/L
Charlotte
Chlorate (max)
838.00 µg/L
—
Bryn Mawr
Molybdenum (max)
8.50 µg/L
—
Bryn Mawr
Industrial proximity
Superfund National Priorities List + Toxic Release Inventory facilities within 10 miles of the city centroid.
Factor
Bryn Mawr
Charlotte
Better
Superfund sites within 10 mi
8
0
Charlotte
TRI lbs to surface water within 10 mi (2023)
43
124
Bryn Mawr
System size & source
Factor
Bryn Mawr
Charlotte
Population served
1.1M
1.2M
—
Water source
Surface water
Surface water
—
Number of water systems
25
28
—
See the full reports
Frequently asked
Which has better water — Bryn Mawr or Charlotte?
Charlotte, NC scores higher (36.5 vs 34.2) on WaterVerge's 100-point methodology, earning a Grade F compared to Bryn Mawr's Grade F. The score combines violation history, lead and copper levels, contaminant testing, monitoring compliance, and source-water type.
How is the WaterVerge water quality score calculated?
The grade combines five subscores: violation history (45 pts, weighted by recency and health-based severity), lead/copper 90th-percentile vs EPA action levels (20 pts), contaminant testing including PFAS, chromium-6, HAA5, NDMA, perchlorate, and Superfund/TRI proximity (20 pts), monitoring compliance (10 pts), and water-source-type risk (5 pts). Full methodology at /about/methodology.
Where does this water quality data come from?
From the EPA's public records: the SDWIS bulk download (violations + system info), UCMR rounds 1–5 (unregulated contaminant testing including PFAS, chromium-6, HAA5, NDMA, perchlorate, vanadium, lithium), the EPA Toxic Release Inventory (industrial polluters), the Superfund National Priorities List, the USGS Powell Domestic-Well Database (private-well chemistry), and the CDC Community Water Fluoridation system. Data is refreshed quarterly.