WaterVerge

Is Whitman, MA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded A- — but Manganese was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓

15K residents served 1 water system PWSID: MA4338000
Overall Score
87.5 / 100
Violations
7 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Purchased surface water
#70 of 280 in Massachusetts Top 25% nationally
Local Government
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
A-GRADE
Water Quality Grade
87.5/100
waterverge.com
A- 87.5/100

Whitman, MA — Water Quality Report

Whitman's drinking water received a grade of A- (87.5 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 14,837 residents using purchased surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 5 PFAS compounds in the water supply.

The system has 21 violations on record, including 5 health-based violations. 7 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Whitman's water

Whitman ranks #70 out of 280 cities in Massachusetts for water quality, placing it above average in the state.

The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection.

PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter.

Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.13 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
87.5 out of 100 Grade A-
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
42.9/45
A
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
20/20
A
Lead at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
15.6/20
B
5 PFAS compounds detected.
Compliance
5/10
D
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
4/5
B
Water source: Purchased surface water.
Water Safety

Is Whitman, MA water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

Whitman's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of A- (87.5/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 14,837 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

7
Active Violations
0.0 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
5 compounds
PFAS Detected
10 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Whitman

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

PFAS
5 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detected

Detected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Whitman's water quality assessment. Grade: A- (87.5/100).

Disaster
HURRICANE LEE

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3599). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Disaster
HURRICANE SANDY

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4097). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Consumer Confidence Rule.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Coliform (TCR).

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Whitman's water supply.

Lead Within Limits
Detected: 0.0 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Well within EPA limits.

PFAS (5 compounds) Elevated
Detected: Highest: lithium at 9.0400 µg/L Limit: 0.004 µg/L (EPA MCL)

Detected but within current EPA limits. PFAS do not break down in the environment and can accumulate in the body over time. An activated carbon filter can reduce exposure.

PFAS "forever chemicals" detected

UCMR 5 testing found 5 PFAS compounds in Whitman's water supply. PFAS are synthetic chemicals that persist indefinitely in the environment and the human body.

Compound Level EPA MCL Status
lithium 9.0400 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
PFBA 0.0059 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
PFHxA 0.0038 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
PFPeA 0.0038 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit

Violation history

Whitman's water system has 21 total violations on record, including 5 health-based violations. 7 remain unresolved.

OtherMCLMR
Most recent violations:
Jul 2010 Consumer Confidence Rule Open
Feb 2010 Coliform (TCR) Resolved
Jul 2009 Consumer Confidence Rule Open
May 2008 Public Notice Open
Apr 2008 Coliform (TCR) Resolved

Flood & environmental risk

Plymouth County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1996. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Monatiquot River, Old Swamp River, Whitmans Pond, Whitmans Pond Dam, Whitmans Pond Flood By-Pass, Whitmans Pond Fish Ladder.

HURRICANE LEE
Hurricane FEMA DR-3599
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA DR-4097
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA DR-3350

Where does Whitman's water come from?

Whitman's drinking water comes from surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs), supplied by 1 water system serving approximately 14,837 people. Surface water sources are more susceptible to contamination from runoff, industrial discharge, and algal blooms, requiring extensive treatment. Nearby water bodies include Monatiquot River (stream), Old Swamp River (river), Whitmans Pond, Whitmans Pond Dam (river), Whitmans Pond Flood By-Pass (river), Whitmans Pond Fish Ladder (river).

What Whitman residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: Activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Whitman's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Monitor alerts during storms

Whitman's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
0.0 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 0% of limit
Safe Level
lithium
PFAS / Forever Chemical
Near MCL
9.0400 µg/L
EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L · +20% over limit
Detected
PFBA
PFAS / Forever Chemical
Near MCL
0.0059 µg/L
EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L · +20% over limit
Detected
HAA5 (Disinfection Byproducts)
Disinfection Byproduct
Safe
23.4 µg/L
EPA MCL: 60 µg/L · 39% of limit
Within LimitUCMR 4 DataHAA6Br: 7.3 µg/LHAA9: 30.4 µg/L
Chromium-6 (Hexavalent Chromium)
Inorganic
Detected
0.13 µg/L
CA MCL (no federal MCL): 10 µg/L · 1% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Strontium
Inorganic
Detected
60.0 µg/L
EPA Health Ref Level: 1,500 µg/L · 4% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Manganese
Inorganic
Over SMCL
81.2 µg/L
EPA Secondary MCL: 50 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over SMCLUCMR 4 Data
Chlorate
Disinfection Byproduct
Elevated
210.0 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 210 µg/L · +0% over limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Lithium
Inorganic
Detected
9.0 µg/L
State screening level: 60 µg/L · 15% of limit
DetectedNo federal MCLUCMR 5 Data (2023–2025)
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
5
Detected
0
Exceed EPA MCL
Compliance Record

Violation summary

21
Total violations
5
Health-based
7
Active / unresolved
Jul 2010
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

21 Total
7 Active
5 Health-based
14 Resolved
Violations by category
Total Coliform Rule
13
Consumer Confidence Rule
3
Lead and Copper Rule
3
Public Notice Rule and Revised PN Rule
1
Jul 2010 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2009 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
May 2008 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Oct 2006 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 1992 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 1992 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Active
Compliance Violation
Monitoring 0
Feb 2010 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Other Violation Resolved Feb 2010
Apr 2008 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Apr 2008
Feb 2006 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Feb 2006
Nov 2004 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Nov 2004
May 2003 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved May 2003
Dec 1999 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Dec 1999
Dec 1999 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Other Violation Resolved Dec 1999
Oct 1999 Resolved
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation Resolved May 2000
Aug 1998 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Aug 1998
Jul 1997 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Other Violation Resolved Jul 1997
Oct 1996 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Other Violation Resolved Oct 1996
Mar 1995 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Mar 1995
Mar 1994 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Mar 1994
Showing 20 of 21 violations
Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D1 — moderate drought

Plymouth County is currently in D1 (moderate drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

6.5%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

10
Declared disasters
Sep 2023
Most recent
Hurricane
Most common type

Plymouth County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1996. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Sep 2023
HURRICANE LEE
Hurricane FEMA #3599
Dec 2012
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA #4097
Oct 2012
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA #3350
Sep 2011
TROPICAL STORM IRENE
Hurricane FEMA #4028
Aug 2011
HURRICANE IRENE
Hurricane FEMA #3330
Sep 2010
HURRICANE EARL
Hurricane FEMA #3315

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in Whitman's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🧪
For PFAS
Reverse Osmosis or Activated Carbon Block
5 PFAS compounds detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 9.040 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA 0.006 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFBS 0.003 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA 0.004 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA 0.004 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has decreased by 18.0 ppb from 1994 (18.0 ppb) to 2024 (0.0 ppb).
Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Purchased Surface Water
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
14,837
Water Systems
1
Water Source

Where Whitman's water comes from

Purchased Surface Water

Whitman's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards.

These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 14,837 people through 1 water system.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near Whitman

Whitman is located near 5 notable water bodies. As a surface water system, these water bodies may directly influence the city's drinking water supply.

Monatiquot River
stream
Old Swamp River
river
Whitmans Pond, Whitmans Pond Dam
river
Whitmans Pond Flood By-Pass
river
Whitmans Pond Fish Ladder
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving Whitman

System Name PWSID Population Source
WHITMAN WATER SYSTEM MA4338000 14,837 SWP
Regional Comparison

How Whitman compares

Full Massachusetts rankings →

Whitman's score of 87.5/100 is above the average of 80/100 among major Massachusetts cities. It outscores 8 of 10 nearby cities.

Whitman (this city)
87.5
Boston
76.8
Worcester
78.9
Beverly
87.5
Massachusetts avg
80
City Profile

About Whitman, MA

Wikipedia →

Whitman is a town in Plymouth County, Massachusetts, United States. The population was 15,121 at the 2020 census. It is located approximately 20 miles (32 km) south of Boston on the western edge of the South Shore. The chocolate chip cookie was invented in Whitman by Ruth Graves Wakefield at the Toll House Inn.

Economic Profile
$101,088
Median Income
$433,717
Median Home Value
$1,606/mo
Median Rent
4.7%
Unemployment
Community
40.3
Median Age
843
People / sq mi
27.2%
College Educated
69.6%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Whitman, MA tap water safe to drink?

Whitman's water quality earned a grade of A- (87.5/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #70 out of 280 cities tested in Massachusetts.

What contaminants are in Whitman's water?

Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). 5 PFAS compounds were detected. 21 violations are on record.

How is Whitman's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Whitman?

PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does Whitman's water come from?

Whitman's water is sourced from Purchased surface water. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 14,837 residents.

What health violations has Whitman's water system had?

Whitman has 5 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in July 2010. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 7 violations remain unresolved.

Why does Whitman have so many PFAS compounds in its water?

5 different PFAS "forever chemical" compounds were detected in Whitman's water supply during UCMR 5 testing. PFAS contamination often originates from proximity to military installations (AFFF firefighting foam), airports, industrial manufacturing sites, or wastewater treatment facilities. While detected, current levels are within EPA limits. An activated carbon filter can further reduce exposure.

How does Whitman's water compare to other cities?

Whitman ranks #70 out of 280 cities in Massachusetts (better than 75% of state cities) and #3987 out of 15744 cities nationally (75th percentile). The grade of A- reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.