WaterVerge

Is Uxbridge, MA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded A- — but Copper, PFOS and 1 more were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓

12K residents served 1 water system PWSID: MA2304000
Overall Score
87.5 / 100
Violations
1 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Groundwater
#71 of 280 in Massachusetts Top 25% nationally
Local Government
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
A-GRADE
Water Quality Grade
87.5/100
waterverge.com
A- 87.5/100

Uxbridge, MA — Water Quality Report

Uxbridge's drinking water received a grade of A- (87.5 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 11,525 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 1.3 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 3 PFAS compounds, with levels exceeding EPA maximum contaminant levels in the water supply.

The system has 24 violations on record, including 2 health-based violations. 1 remains unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Uxbridge's water

Uxbridge ranks #71 out of 280 cities in Massachusetts for water quality, placing it mid-range in the state.

Uxbridge relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

Of particular concern: PFAS "forever chemical" levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels. These synthetic compounds don't break down naturally and require specialized filtration such as reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon.

Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.09 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
87.5 out of 100 Grade A-
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
43.1/45
A
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
16/20
B
Lead at 1.3 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
13.4/20
C
3 PFAS compounds detected.
Compliance
10/10
A
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
5/5
A
Water source: Groundwater.
Water Safety

Is Uxbridge, MA water safe to drink?

Use Caution

Uxbridge's tap water meets most EPA standards but has areas that warrant attention. With a grade of A- (87.5/100), some contaminant levels or compliance issues suggest that residents may benefit from additional filtration. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 11,525 residents using groundwater (wells).

1
Active Violations
1.3 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
3 compounds
PFAS Detected
10 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Uxbridge

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

PFAS
3 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detected

PFAS levels exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or activated carbon filtration recommended.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Uxbridge's water quality assessment. Grade: A- (87.5/100).

Disaster
SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4780). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Disaster
HURRICANE LEE

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3599). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

1 health-based. Contaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

1 health-based. Contaminants: Coliform (TCR).

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Uxbridge's water supply.

Lead Within Limits
Detected: 1.3 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Well within EPA limits.

Copper Exceeds Limit
Detected: 1.40 mg/L Limit: 1.3 mg/L (EPA Action Level)

Exceeds EPA action level. Copper can leach from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking.

PFAS (3 compounds) Exceeds Limit
Detected: Highest: PFOS at 0.0067 µg/L Limit: 0.004 µg/L (EPA MCL)

PFAS "forever chemicals" exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon filtration strongly recommended.

PFAS "forever chemicals" detected

UCMR 5 testing found 3 PFAS compounds in Uxbridge's water supply. PFAS are synthetic chemicals that persist indefinitely in the environment and the human body.

Compound Level EPA MCL Status
PFOS 0.0067 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Over MCL
PFBS 0.0038 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
PFHxS 0.0034 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit

Violation history

Uxbridge's water system has 24 total violations on record, including 2 health-based violations. 1 remain unresolved.

MCLMR
Most recent violations:
Jun 2016 Revised Total Coliform Rule Resolved
Jul 2004 Coliform (TCR) Resolved
Jul 1996 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene Resolved
Jul 1996 Xylenes, Total Resolved
Jul 1996 DICHLOROMETHANE Resolved

Flood & environmental risk

Worcester County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1991. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Blackstone River, W. Main St.,, Blackstone River, West River Below West Hill Dam, Nr Uxbridge, Blackstone River, Rt 122 Bridge, Nipmuc River.

SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA DR-4780
HURRICANE LEE
Hurricane FEMA DR-3599
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA DR-3350

Where does Uxbridge's water come from?

Uxbridge's drinking water comes from groundwater (wells), supplied by 1 water system serving approximately 11,525 people. Groundwater is generally less susceptible to surface contamination but can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate. Nearby water bodies include Blackstone River, W. Main St., (river), Blackstone River (river), West River Below West Hill Dam, Nr Uxbridge (river), Blackstone River, Rt 122 Bridge (river), Nipmuc River (river).

What Uxbridge residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: Reverse osmosis system. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Uxbridge's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Monitor alerts during storms

Uxbridge's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
1.3 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 9% of limit
Safe Level
Copper (90th percentile)
Inorganic
Over Limit
1.40 mg/L
EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L · +8% over limit
Exceeds Limit
PFOS
PFAS / Forever Chemical
Over MCL
0.0067 µg/L
EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L · +20% over limit
Exceeds MCL
HAA5 (Disinfection Byproducts)
Disinfection Byproduct
Safe
4.6 µg/L
EPA MCL: 60 µg/L · 8% of limit
Within LimitUCMR 4 DataHAA6Br: 5.9 µg/LHAA9: 8.1 µg/L
Chromium-6 (Hexavalent Chromium)
Inorganic
Detected
0.09 µg/L
CA MCL (no federal MCL): 10 µg/L · 1% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Strontium
Inorganic
Detected
110.0 µg/L
EPA Health Ref Level: 1,500 µg/L · 7% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
1,4-Dioxane
Organic
Detected
0.11 µg/L
EPA Health Advisory: 0.35 µg/L · 31% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Manganese
Inorganic
Over SMCL
204.0 µg/L
EPA Secondary MCL: 50 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over SMCLUCMR 4 Data
Chlorate
Disinfection Byproduct
Detected
54.0 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 210 µg/L · 26% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
3
Detected
1
Exceed EPA MCL
1.68
Hazard Index
PFOS max: 0.0067 µg/L
Compliance Record

Violation summary

24
Total violations
2
Health-based
1
Active / unresolved
Jun 2016
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

24 Total
1 Active
2 Health-based
23 Resolved
Violations by category
Volatile Organic Chemicals
21
Revised Total Coliform Rule
1
Total Coliform Rule
1
Active
Compliance Violation
Monitoring 0
Jun 2016 Resolved
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Jun 2016
Jul 2004 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Jul 2004
Jul 1996 Resolved
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
Xylenes, Total
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
DICHLOROMETHANE
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
o-Dichlorobenzene
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
p-Dichlorobenzene
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
1,2-Dichloroethane
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
Carbon tetrachloride
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
Benzene
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
Toluene
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
Ethylbenzene
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
Tetrachloroethylene
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Jul 1996 Resolved
Trichloroethylene
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1996
Showing 20 of 24 violations
Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D1 — moderate drought

Worcester County is currently in D1 (moderate drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

8.0%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)
6
Weeks at D2+ (last 5y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

10
Declared disasters
May 2024
Most recent
Hurricane
Most common type

Worcester County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1991. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

May 2024
SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA #4780
Sep 2023
HURRICANE LEE
Hurricane FEMA #3599
Oct 2012
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA #3350
Aug 2011
HURRICANE IRENE
Hurricane FEMA #3330
Sep 2010
HURRICANE EARL
Hurricane FEMA #3315
Sep 2005
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION
Hurricane FEMA #3252

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in Uxbridge's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🧪
For PFAS
Reverse Osmosis or Activated Carbon Block
PFAS compounds exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels
🔧
For Copper
Reverse Osmosis or KDF Filter
Copper exceeds the EPA action level of 1.3 mg/L

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 1.3 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 1.40 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS 0.004 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS 0.003 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS 0.007 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has decreased by 11.7 ppb from 1992 (13.0 ppb) to 2025 (1.3 ppb).

Copper level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 1.3 mg/L
Copper has decreased by 4.370 mg/L from 1992 (5.770 mg/L) to 2007 (1.400 mg/L).
Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Groundwater
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
11,525
Water Systems
1
Water Source

Where Uxbridge's water comes from

Groundwater

Uxbridge's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals.

Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 11,525 people through 1 water system.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near Uxbridge

Uxbridge is located near 5 notable water bodies. These water bodies contribute to the regional watershed and may indirectly affect groundwater quality.

Blackstone River, W. Main St.,
river
Blackstone River
river
West River Below West Hill Dam, Nr Uxbridge
river
Blackstone River, Rt 122 Bridge
river
Nipmuc River
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving Uxbridge

System Name PWSID Population Source
UXBRIDGE DPW, WATER DIVISION MA2304000 11,525 GW
Regional Comparison

How Uxbridge compares

Full Massachusetts rankings →

Uxbridge's score of 87.5/100 is above the average of 80/100 among major Massachusetts cities. It outscores 8 of 10 nearby cities.

Uxbridge (this city)
87.5
Boston
76.8
Worcester
78.9
Beverly
87.5
Massachusetts avg
80
City Profile

About Uxbridge, MA

Wikipedia →

Uxbridge is a town in Worcester County, Massachusetts, United States, first colonized in 1662 and incorporated in 1727. It was originally part of the town of Mendon, and named for the Earl of Uxbridge. The town is located 36 mi (58 km) southwest of Boston and 15 mi (24 km) south-southeast of Worcester, at the midpoint of the Blackstone Valley National Historic Park. The historical society notes that Uxbridge is the "Heart of The Blackstone Valley" and is also known as "the Cradle of the Industrial Revolution". Uxbridge was a prominent Textile center in the American Industrial Revolution. Uxbridge was an early center for rural engagement in the American anti-slavery movement. The age of computing started here with IBM’s first, chief engineer and lab. Uxbridge "weaves a tapestry of early America".

Economic Profile
$124,682
Median Income
$399,726
Median Home Value
$1,374/mo
Median Rent
4%
Unemployment
Community
42.9
Median Age
186
People / sq mi
36.3%
College Educated
81.4%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Uxbridge, MA tap water safe to drink?

Uxbridge's water quality earned a grade of A- (87.5/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #71 out of 280 cities tested in Massachusetts.

What contaminants are in Uxbridge's water?

Lead was measured at 1.3 ppb (90th percentile). 3 PFAS compounds were detected. 24 violations are on record.

How is Uxbridge's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Uxbridge?

PFAS compounds exceed EPA limits — a reverse osmosis or activated carbon filter is recommended.

Where does Uxbridge's water come from?

Uxbridge's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 11,525 residents.

What health violations has Uxbridge's water system had?

Uxbridge has 2 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in June 2016. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 1 violation remains unresolved.

Is Uxbridge's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Uxbridge uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 24 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

Why does Uxbridge have so many PFAS compounds in its water?

3 different PFAS "forever chemical" compounds were detected in Uxbridge's water supply during UCMR 5 testing. PFAS contamination often originates from proximity to military installations (AFFF firefighting foam), airports, industrial manufacturing sites, or wastewater treatment facilities. Some levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels — a reverse osmosis or NSF-certified activated carbon filter is strongly recommended.

How does Uxbridge's water compare to other cities?

Uxbridge ranks #71 out of 280 cities in Massachusetts (better than 75% of state cities) and #3991 out of 15744 cities nationally (75th percentile). The grade of A- reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.