WaterVerge

Is Redding, CA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded F — but Copper, Manganese and 1 more were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓

121K residents served 21 water systems PWSID: CA4510005
Overall Score
34.8 / 100
Violations
78 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Surface water
#687 of 694 in California Top 99% nationally
Local Government
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
FGRADE
Water Quality Grade
34.8/100
waterverge.com
F 34.8/100

Redding, CA — Water Quality Report

Redding's drinking water received a grade of F (34.8 out of 100), indicating failing water quality. The city's 21 water systems serve approximately 121,080 residents using surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 0.7 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 8 PFAS compounds, with levels exceeding EPA maximum contaminant levels in the water supply.

The system has 314 violations on record, including 49 health-based violations. 78 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Redding's water

Redding ranks #687 out of 694 cities in California for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state.

The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection.

Of particular concern: PFAS "forever chemical" levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels. These synthetic compounds don't break down naturally and require specialized filtration such as reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon.

Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.54 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.

The system has seen 88 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
34.8 out of 100 Grade F
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
0/45
F
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
16/20
B
Lead at 0.7 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
9.8/20
D
8 PFAS compounds detected.
Compliance
5/10
D
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
4/5
B
Water source: Surface water.
Water Safety

Is Redding, CA water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

Redding's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of F (34.8/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 21 water systems serve approximately 121,080 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

78
Active Violations
0.7 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
8 compounds
PFAS Detected
9 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Redding

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

PFAS
8 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detected

PFAS levels exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or activated carbon filtration recommended.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Redding's water quality assessment. Grade: F (34.8/100).

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Chlorine.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.

Disaster
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, AND MUDSLIDES

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4308). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Redding's water supply.

Lead Within Limits
Detected: 0.7 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Well within EPA limits.

Copper Exceeds Limit
Detected: 111.90 mg/L Limit: 1.3 mg/L (EPA Action Level)

Exceeds EPA action level. Copper can leach from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking.

PFAS (8 compounds) Elevated
Detected: Highest: lithium at 38.4000 µg/L Limit: 0.004 µg/L (EPA MCL)

PFAS "forever chemicals" exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon filtration strongly recommended.

PFAS "forever chemicals" detected

UCMR 5 testing found 8 PFAS compounds in Redding's water supply. PFAS are synthetic chemicals that persist indefinitely in the environment and the human body.

Compound Level EPA MCL Status
lithium 38.4000 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
PFOA 0.0162 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Over MCL
PFOS 0.0126 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Over MCL
PFBS 0.0089 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit

Violation history

Redding's water system has 314 total violations on record, including 49 health-based violations. 78 remain unresolved. 88 violations were issued in the last 5 years.

MONMRRPTOtherTTMCL
Most recent violations:
Nov 2025 Revised Total Coliform Rule Resolved
Oct 2025 Chlorine Resolved
Sep 2025 Revised Total Coliform Rule Resolved
Jul 2025 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Jul 2025 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open

Flood & environmental risk

Shasta County has experienced 9 federally declared disasters since 1964. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Sacramento R A Keswick, Anderson-Cottonwood Id, Clear C Nr Igo.

SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, AND MUDSLIDES
Flood FEMA DR-4308
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION
Hurricane FEMA DR-3248
SEVERE WINTER STORM, MUD & LAND SLIDES, & FLOODING
Flood FEMA DR-979

Where does Redding's water come from?

Redding's drinking water comes from surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs), supplied by 21 water systems serving approximately 121,080 people. Surface water sources are more susceptible to contamination from runoff, industrial discharge, and algal blooms, requiring extensive treatment. Nearby water bodies include Sacramento R A Keswick (river), Anderson-Cottonwood Id (river), Clear C Nr Igo (river).

What Redding residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: Reverse osmosis system. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Redding's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Monitor alerts during storms

Redding's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
0.7 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 5% of limit
Safe Level
Copper (90th percentile)
Inorganic
Over Limit
111.90 mg/L
EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L · +20% over limit
Exceeds Limit
lithium
PFAS / Forever Chemical
Near MCL
38.4000 µg/L
EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L · +20% over limit
Detected
HAA5 (Disinfection Byproducts)
Disinfection Byproduct
Safe
27.9 µg/L
EPA MCL: 60 µg/L · 47% of limit
Within LimitUCMR 4 DataHAA6Br: 1.9 µg/LHAA9: 29.8 µg/L
Chromium-6 (Hexavalent Chromium)
Inorganic
Detected
0.54 µg/L
CA MCL (no federal MCL): 10 µg/L · 5% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Strontium
Inorganic
Detected
500.0 µg/L
EPA Health Ref Level: 1,500 µg/L · 33% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Manganese
Inorganic
Over SMCL
95.0 µg/L
EPA Secondary MCL: 50 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over SMCLUCMR 4 Data
Vanadium
Inorganic
Detected
4.75 µg/L
EPA Short-term HA: 21 µg/L · 23% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Chlorate
Disinfection Byproduct
Over HA
305.0 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 210 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over Health AdvisoryUCMR 3 Data
Molybdenum
Inorganic
Detected
2.16 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 40 µg/L · 5% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Lithium
Inorganic
Detected
38.4 µg/L
State screening level: 60 µg/L · 64% of limit
DetectedNo federal MCLUCMR 5 Data (2023–2025)
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
8
Detected
2
Exceed EPA MCL
7.20
Hazard Index
PFOS max: 0.0126 µg/L PFOA max: 0.0162 µg/L
Compliance Record

Violation summary

314
Total violations
49
Health-based
78
Active / unresolved
Nov 2025
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

314 Total
78 Active
49 Health-based
236 Resolved
6 SNC
Violations by category
Miscellaneous Other Rules
93
Total Coliform Rule
34
Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
31
Lead and Copper Rule Revisions
28
Revised Total Coliform Rule
26
Jul 2025 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Jul 2025 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Apr 2025 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Showing 20 of 314 violations
Industrial pollution

Top industrial polluters within 10 miles of Redding

Industrial polluters nearby

Reported releases to surface water by facilities near Redding, ranked by pounds discharged annually.

FacilityTop chemicalTo surface water (lbs/yr)Distance
J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION INC. AGGREGATE PRODUCTS
Petroleum · JF SHEA CO INC
REDDING, CA96001
5.0 mi
J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION INC FAWNDALE ROCK & ASPHALT
Petroleum · JF SHEA CO INC
REDDING, CA96002
2.0 mi
SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES ANDERSON DIV
Wood Products · SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES
ANDERSON, CA96007
7.4 mi
CAPTIVEAIRE SYSTEMS INC
Fabricated Metals · CAPTIVEAIRE SYSTEMS INC
REDDING, CA96002
5.7 mi
KNAUF INSULATION INC.
Nonmetallic Mineral Product · KNAUF INSULATION
SHASTA LAKE, CA96019
6.2 mi

Source: EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) 2023

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

9
Declared disasters
Apr 2017
Most recent
Flood
Most common type

Shasta County has experienced 9 federally declared disasters since 1964. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Apr 2017
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, AND MUDSLIDES
Flood FEMA #4308
Sep 2005
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION
Hurricane FEMA #3248
Feb 1993
SEVERE WINTER STORM, MUD & LAND SLIDES, & FLOODING
Flood FEMA #979
Feb 1986
SEVERE STORMS & FLOODING
Flood FEMA #758
Feb 1983
COASTAL STORMS, FLOODS, SLIDES & TORNADOES
Coastal Storm FEMA #677
Jan 1974
SEVERE STORMS & FLOODING
Flood FEMA #412

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in Redding's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🧪
For PFAS
Reverse Osmosis or Activated Carbon Block
PFAS compounds exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels
🔧
For Copper
Reverse Osmosis or KDF Filter
Copper exceeds the EPA action level of 1.3 mg/L

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.7 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 111.90 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 38.400 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS 0.009 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA 0.005 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA 0.007 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFHxS 0.009 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA 0.016 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFOS 0.013 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFPeA 0.006 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has decreased by 8.3 ppb from 1992 (9.0 ppb) to 2027 (0.7 ppb).

Copper level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 1.3 mg/L
Copper has increased by 110.110 mg/L from 2019 (1.790 mg/L) to 2021 (111.900 mg/L).
Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Surface Water
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
121,080
Water Systems
21
Source breakdown
Groundwater
11
Surface Water
8
Purchased Surface Water
2
Water Source

Where Redding's water comes from

Surface Water

Redding's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards.

These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 121,080 people through 21 water systems.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near Redding

Redding is located near 3 notable water bodies. As a surface water system, these water bodies may directly influence the city's drinking water supply.

Sacramento R A Keswick
river
Anderson-Cottonwood Id
river
Clear C Nr Igo
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving Redding

System Name PWSID Population Source
CITY OF REDDING CA4510005 89,628 SW
BELLA VISTA WATER DISTRICT CA4510014 18,612 SW
CENTERVILLE C.S.D. CA4510011 4,151 SWP
MOUNTAIN GATE C.S.D. CA4510002 2,227 SW
Redding Rancheria 090605083 2,015 SWP
SHASTA CSA - JONES VALLEY, #6 CA4510004 2,006 SW
SHASTA CSA - FRENCH GULCH, #11 CA4500317 419 SW
SHASTA CSA - CASTELLA, #3 CA4500015 333 SW
SHASTA CSA - SUGARLOAF, #2 CA4500006 274 SW
SHASTA CO CSA # 8 PALO CEDRO CA4500313 261 GW
LAZY LANDING MOBILE HOME PARK CA4500081 250 GW
SHASTA CSA - CRAGVIEW, #23 CA4500028 248 SW
SHASTA CO CSA # 13 ALPINE MEADOWS CA4500314 141 GW
SADDLEBACK MUTUAL WATER CO. CA5200645 90 GW
CASCADE RACQUET CLUB MUTUAL WATER CA4500012 89 GW
NORTH REDDING RV VILLAGE CA4500102 78 GW
CLEAR CREEK MOBILE PARK CA4500066 75 GW
PALISADES, THE CA1100452 62 GW
COVINGTON MILL - A CA5301103 60 GW
CANYON CREEK MHP CA4500093 35 GW
RIO VISTA MOBILEHOME ESTATES CA4500106 26 GW
Regional Comparison

How Redding compares

Full California rankings →

Redding's score of 34.8/100 is below the average of 57/100 among major California cities. It outscores 3 of 10 nearby cities. 7 of 10 nearby cities score higher.

Redding (this city)
34.8
Oakland
77.9
San Diego
39.7
Sacramento
31.2
California avg
57
Service Area

ZIP codes served by Redding

The water systems serving Redding cover 1 ZIP code. Select any ZIP to see which water systems serve that area.

City Profile

About Redding, CA

Wikipedia →

Redding is a city in and the county seat of Shasta County, California, and the economic and cultural capital of the Shasta Cascade region of Northern California. Redding lies along the Sacramento River, 162 miles (261 km) north of Sacramento, and 120 miles (190 km) south of California's northern border with Oregon. Its population was 93,611 at the 2020 census.

Economic Profile
$67,323
Median Income
$340,302
Median Home Value
$1,278/mo
Median Rent
5.9%
Unemployment
Community
38.8
Median Age
606
People / sq mi
26.4%
College Educated
54.9%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Redding, CA tap water safe to drink?

Redding's water quality earned a grade of F (34.8/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #687 out of 694 cities tested in California.

What contaminants are in Redding's water?

Lead was measured at 0.7 ppb (90th percentile). 8 PFAS compounds were detected. 314 violations are on record.

How is Redding's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Redding?

PFAS compounds exceed EPA limits — a reverse osmosis or activated carbon filter is recommended.

Where does Redding's water come from?

Redding's water is sourced from Surface water. The city has 21 water systems serving approximately 121,080 residents.

What health violations has Redding's water system had?

Redding has 49 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in November 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 78 violations remain unresolved.

Why does Redding have so many PFAS compounds in its water?

8 different PFAS "forever chemical" compounds were detected in Redding's water supply during UCMR 5 testing. PFAS contamination often originates from proximity to military installations (AFFF firefighting foam), airports, industrial manufacturing sites, or wastewater treatment facilities. Some levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels — a reverse osmosis or NSF-certified activated carbon filter is strongly recommended.

How does Redding's water compare to other cities?

Redding ranks #687 out of 694 cities in California (better than 1% of state cities) and #15553 out of 15744 cities nationally (1th percentile). The grade of F reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.