Is Raleigh, NC Tap Water Safe to Drink?
Graded F — but Copper, Chromium-6 and 5 more were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓
30.7/100
waterverge.com Raleigh, NC — Water Quality Report
Raleigh's drinking water received a grade of F (30.7 out of 100), indicating failing water quality. The city's 96 water systems serve approximately 675,724 residents using surface water.
Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 10 PFAS compounds, with levels exceeding EPA maximum contaminant levels in the water supply.
The system has 3207 violations on record, including 241 health-based violations. 584 remain unresolved.
What to know about Raleigh's water
Raleigh ranks #416 out of 417 cities in North Carolina for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state.
The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection.
Of particular concern: PFAS "forever chemical" levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels. These synthetic compounds don't break down naturally and require specialized filtration such as reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon.
Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 11.00 µg/L, above California's 10 µg/L limit. There is no federal MCL, but the EPA is reviewing evidence linking long-term exposure to cancer risk.
As a major metropolitan system serving over 676K residents, Raleigh faces large-scale infrastructure challenges including aging pipes and the complexity of treating water across a vast distribution network.
The system has seen 276 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.
Water quality score
See methodology →Is Raleigh, NC water safe to drink?
Raleigh's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of F (30.7/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 96 water systems serve approximately 675,724 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).
Recent water quality updates for Raleigh
A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.
PFAS levels exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or activated carbon filtration recommended.
Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Raleigh's water quality assessment. Grade: F (30.7/100).
Contaminants: Public Notice.
Contaminants: Public Notice.
2 health-based. Contaminants: Toluene, cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene, Ethylbenzene.
Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3586). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Key contaminant findings
Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Raleigh's water supply.
Well within EPA limits.
Exceeds EPA action level. Copper can leach from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking.
PFAS "forever chemicals" exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon filtration strongly recommended.
The "Erin Brockovich" chemical. There is no federal MCL, but California has set a limit of 10 µg/L. Reverse osmosis filtration is effective at removing hexavalent chromium.
PFAS "forever chemicals" detected
UCMR 5 testing found 10 PFAS compounds in Raleigh's water supply. PFAS are synthetic chemicals that persist indefinitely in the environment and the human body.
Violation history
Raleigh's water system has 3,207 total violations on record, including 241 health-based violations. 584 remain unresolved. 276 violations were issued in the last 5 years.
Flood & environmental risk
Wake County has experienced 7 federally declared disasters since 2005. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Lake Crabtree, Crabtree, Richland Lake, Lake Lynn, Crabtree Creek.
Where does Raleigh's water come from?
Raleigh's drinking water comes from surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs), supplied by 96 water systems serving approximately 675,724 people. Surface water sources are more susceptible to contamination from runoff, industrial discharge, and algal blooms, requiring extensive treatment. Nearby water bodies include Lake Crabtree (lake), Crabtree (river), Richland Lake (lake), Lake Lynn (lake), Crabtree Creek (river).
What Raleigh residents can do
Recommended: Reverse osmosis system. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Raleigh's water.
Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.
Raleigh's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.
Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.
Top contaminants to know
View all ↓Forever chemicals overview
National PFAS report →Violation summary
Violations & advisories
Top industrial polluters within 10 miles of Raleigh
Industrial polluters nearby
Reported releases to surface water by facilities near Raleigh, ranked by pounds discharged annually.
Total reported releases to surface water: 23,480 lbs
| Facility | Top chemical | To surface water (lbs/yr) | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|
MALLINCKRODT PHARMACEUTICALS RALEIGH, NC27616 | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | 23,477 | 6.5 mi |
CONCRETE SUPPLY CO. LLC - DURANT PARK RALEIGH, NC27616 | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) | 3 | 4.9 mi |
KELLANOVA - CARY BAKERY CARY, NC27513 | — | — | 9.5 mi |
ARGOS READY MIX CARY CONCRETE PLANT CARY, NC27513 | — | — | 7.7 mi |
ARGOS KNIGHTDALE CONCRETE PLANT KNIGHTDALE, NC27545 | — | — | 8.6 mi |
Source: EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) 2023
Superfund sites within 10 miles of Raleigh
Superfund sites nearby
Federally tracked hazardous-waste sites on the EPA National Priorities List. Proximity does not necessarily indicate tap-water contamination — the connection depends on hydrology and treatment.
- NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY LOT 86 FARM UNIT 14.6 mi
- WARD TRANSFORMER8.9 mi
Source: EPA Superfund National Priorities List
Drought conditions
D3 — extreme droughtDurham County is currently in D3 (extreme drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.
Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.
Flood & disaster history
Wake County has experienced 7 federally declared disasters since 2005. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.
Recommended water filters
Based on contaminants detected in Raleigh's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.
Full contaminants report
| Contaminant | Detected Level | EPA Limit | Unit | Category | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead (90th percentile) LeadHeavy Metal A toxic heavy metal that can leach into drinking water from older pipes, solder, and fixtures. No amount of lead in water is considered safe. Health EffectsBrain and nervous system damage in children, kidney damage, high blood pressure, and reproductive problems in adults. EPA Limit15 ppb action level Common SourcesCorrosion of lead pipes, lead solder, brass faucets, and household plumbing. | 0.0 | 15 | ppb | Inorganic | Safe |
| Copper (90th percentile) CopperInorganic A metal that enters drinking water mainly through corrosion of copper plumbing. Small amounts are essential for health, but excess levels are harmful. Health EffectsGastrointestinal distress (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) at short-term high levels; liver and kidney damage from long-term exposure. EPA Limit1.3 mg/L action level Common SourcesCorrosion of copper household plumbing, erosion of natural deposits. | 1.40 | 1.3 | mg/L | Inorganic | Over Limit |
| 11Cl-PF3OUdS | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| 4:2 FTS | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| 6:2 FTS 6:2 FTSPFAS A fluorotelomer sulfonate commonly found at sites contaminated with aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) used in firefighting. Health EffectsPotential liver toxicity and endocrine disruption. Less studied but identified as a contaminant of concern. EPA LimitNo individual MCL (not yet regulated) Common SourcesFirefighting foam (AFFF), airports, military bases, and industrial facilities. | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| 8:2 FTS | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| 9Cl-PF3ONS | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| ADONA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| HFPO-DA HFPO-DA (GenX)PFAS A replacement for PFOA in manufacturing, marketed as safer but still a persistent "forever chemical." Also known as GenX. Health EffectsLiver and kidney effects, reproductive toxicity, immune system effects, and potential cancer risk. EPA Limit10 ppt MCL Common SourcesFluoropolymer manufacturing (used as PFOA replacement), industrial wastewater discharge. | ND | 0.01 | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| lithium LithiumInorganic A naturally occurring alkali metal found in groundwater. Monitored under UCMR 5 to assess occurrence in drinking water. Health EffectsKidney effects at high doses. Low-level exposure effects under study; some research suggests neurological effects. EPA LimitNo MCL (monitoring only under UCMR 5) Common SourcesNatural mineral deposits, geothermal water, and industrial discharge. | 16.300 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| NEtFOSAA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| NFDHA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| NMeFOSAA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFBA PFBAPFAS One of the shortest-chain PFAS compounds. Very mobile in water and difficult to remove with standard filtration. Health EffectsThyroid effects, potential developmental toxicity. Shorter half-life in body than long-chain PFAS. EPA LimitNo individual MCL (not yet regulated) Common SourcesDegradation of longer-chain PFAS, industrial discharge, and firefighting foam. | 0.018 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| PFBS PFBSPFAS A short-chain PFAS used as a replacement for PFOS. While it clears the body faster than long-chain PFAS, it still persists in the environment. Health EffectsThyroid effects, reproductive and developmental toxicity, kidney effects. EPA LimitPart of Hazard Index (1.0) Common SourcesIndustrial discharge, firefighting foam, and as a replacement chemical in manufacturing. | 0.040 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| PFDA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFDoA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFEESA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFHpA PFHpAPFAS A medium-chain PFAS compound found in various environmental samples. Less studied than PFOA/PFOS but still considered a contaminant of concern. Health EffectsLiver effects, potential developmental toxicity, and endocrine disruption. EPA LimitPart of Hazard Index (1.0) Common SourcesDegradation of longer-chain PFAS, industrial discharge, and contaminated water sources. | 0.014 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| PFHpS | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFHxA PFHxAPFAS A short-chain PFAS replacement chemical widely used after manufacturers phased out longer-chain PFAS. Very commonly detected in water. Health EffectsLiver and kidney effects, potential thyroid disruption. Considered less toxic than long-chain PFAS but still persistent. EPA LimitNo individual MCL (not yet regulated) Common SourcesIndustrial processes, firefighting foam (AFFF), food packaging, and textile treatment. | 0.057 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| PFHxS PFHxSPFAS A medium-chain PFAS found in firefighting foam and consumer products. It has a long half-life in the human body, similar to long-chain PFAS. Health EffectsImmune system effects, thyroid disruption, and potential reproductive and developmental harm. EPA LimitPart of Hazard Index (1.0) Common SourcesFirefighting foam (AFFF), waterproof textiles, food packaging, and industrial discharge. | 0.153 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| PFMBA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFMPA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFNA PFNAPFAS A long-chain PFAS compound used in manufacturing fluoropolymers. It bioaccumulates in the body and is very persistent in the environment. Health EffectsDevelopmental effects, liver toxicity, immune suppression, and potential cancer risk. EPA LimitPart of Hazard Index (1.0) Common SourcesFluoropolymer manufacturing, industrial emissions, and contaminated water sources. | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFOA PFOAPFAS A long-chain PFAS ("forever chemical") once widely used in nonstick coatings and firefighting foam. It persists in the body and environment for years. Health EffectsLinked to kidney and testicular cancer, thyroid disease, elevated cholesterol, and reproductive issues. EPA Limit4.0 ppt MCL Common SourcesIndustrial discharge, firefighting foam (AFFF), nonstick cookware manufacturing, and contaminated groundwater. | 0.010 | 0.004 | µg/L | PFAS | Over MCL |
| PFOS PFOSPFAS A long-chain PFAS compound historically used in stain-resistant coatings and firefighting foam. One of the most studied and persistent PFAS chemicals. Health EffectsLiver damage, immune system suppression, thyroid disruption, increased cholesterol, and potential cancer risk. EPA Limit4.0 ppt MCL Common SourcesFirefighting foam (AFFF), industrial sites, stain-resistant fabric treatments, and contaminated groundwater. | 0.021 | 0.004 | µg/L | PFAS | Over MCL |
| PFPeA PFPeAPFAS A short-chain PFAS compound commonly detected in drinking water. One of the most frequently found PFAS in UCMR 5 monitoring. Health EffectsLess studied than PFOA/PFOS. Potential liver and thyroid effects. Research is ongoing. EPA LimitNo individual MCL (not yet regulated) Common SourcesIndustrial discharge, firefighting foam degradation, and consumer products. | 0.059 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| PFPeS | 0.036 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| PFTA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFTrDA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFUnA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
Lead level trend (90th percentile)
Copper level trend (90th percentile)
See how Raleigh compares by contaminant
Explore where Raleigh ranks among all North Carolina cities for specific contaminants.
Water source & infrastructure
Where Raleigh's water comes from
Raleigh's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.
Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards.
These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge.
The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 675,724 people through 96 water systems.
Water bodies near Raleigh
Raleigh is located near 5 notable water bodies. As a surface water system, these water bodies may directly influence the city's drinking water supply.
Water systems serving Raleigh
| System Name | PWSID | Population | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| RALEIGH, CITY OF | NC0392010 | 640,000 | SW |
| BAYLEAF MASTER | NC0392373 | 15,585 | GW |
| STONEHENGE S/D | NC0392298 | 1,840 | GW |
| ROYAL SENTER RIDGE S/D | NC4392140 | 740 | GW |
| MALLARDS CROSSING S/D | NC0392356 | 709 | GW |
| MYATT MILL S/D | NC0392085 | 676 | GW |
| LYNNHAVEN-CROWSDALE | NC0392253 | 650 | GW |
| GLENDALE MASTER SYSTEM | NC0392293 | 633 | GW |
| ALL STAR MHP | NC0392102 | 530 | GW |
| BRIARWOOD/KILDAIRE | NC0392383 | 517 | GW |
| CROSS CREEK MHP | NC0392351 | 467 | GW |
| HAMPTON RIDGE S/D | NC0392376 | 460 | GW |
| MEADOW RIDGE S/D | NC0392363 | 453 | GW |
| TRADEWINDS S/D | NC0392094 | 442 | GW |
| DEERFIELD PARK S/D | NC0392250 | 440 | GW |
| SADDLERIDGE S/D | NC4392103 | 433 | GW |
| WAKEFIELD S/D | NC0392155 | 408 | GW |
| BROOKSTONE S/D | NC4392112 | 399 | GW |
| OLDE MILL TRACE S/D | NC4092168 | 394 | GW |
| NEUSE RIVER VILLAGE MHP | NC0392225 | 333 | GW |
| ALTICE ESTATES S/D | NC0392323 | 330 | GW |
| SOUTHWOOD-SURRY RIDGE S/D | NC0392338 | 314 | GW |
| STEVENS OAKS | NC4392181 | 292 | GW |
| NEUSE WOODS MH S/D | NC0392168 | 287 | GW |
| KNIGHTDALE MHP ESTATES LLC | NC0392214 | 285 | GW |
| BERKSHIRE DOWNS | NC0392320 | 277 | GW |
| HEATHERSTONE WEST S/D | NC4392119 | 234 | GW |
| SOUTH MOUNTAIN S/D | NC4392120 | 234 | GW |
| KANATA MILLS S/D | NC4092145 | 233 | GW |
| EAGLE CREEK S/D | NC4392128 | 223 | GW |
| MORNINGTON S/D | NC4092153 | 218 | GW |
| THE POINTE S/D | NC0392348 | 203 | GW |
| FOXMOOR S/D | NC4392163 | 203 | GW |
| LAKEFALL S/D | NC4392143 | 188 | GW |
| CAMBRIDGE S/D | NC0392251 | 185 | GW |
| RIVERVIEW NORTH | NC0392163 | 180 | GW |
| WOODSCREEK S/D | NC0392261 | 180 | GW |
| LAKE WHEELER MHP | NC0392149 | 180 | GW |
| YATES MILL RUN S/D | NC0392090 | 178 | GW |
| WATERSTONE RESERVE | NC4092136 | 175 | GW |
| OAK CHASE S/D | NC4392122 | 175 | GW |
| JACKSON MANOR S/D | NC4092146 | 175 | GW |
| BUFFALOE ROAD MHP | NC0392144 | 162 | GW |
| DEVONSHIRE S/D | NC4092057 | 150 | GW |
| WEXFORD S/D | NC0332140 | 148 | GW |
| WOODSPRING S/D | NC4392123 | 147 | GW |
| WOODS OF ASHBURY SD | NC0392388 | 144 | GW |
| YATES MILL ESTATES | NC4092131 | 140 | GW |
| EMERALD VILLAGE S/D | NC0392128 | 125 | GW |
| INWOOD FOREST | NC4092105 | 125 | GW |
| ROBINFIELD ESTATES S/D | NC0392350 | 124 | GW |
| BELLA VISTA S/D | NC4092128 | 120 | GW |
| WORTHINGTON S/D | NC4392158 | 119 | GW |
| LAKEVIEW MOBILE ESTATES | NC0392151 | 114 | GW |
| WILLOW BLUFFS V | NC4092060 | 114 | GW |
| BAILEY`S LANDING S/D | NC4392192 | 114 | GW |
| RIVER OAKS S/D | NC0392096 | 112 | GW |
| SWEETWATER S/D | NC4092166 | 110 | GW |
| SOUTHERN MEADOWS S/D | NC4092061 | 109 | GW |
| LAKEWOOD ESTATES | NC0392294 | 102 | GW |
| STEEPLECHASE S/D | NC0392117 | 101 | GW |
| MONTICELLO S/D | NC0392362 | 101 | GW |
| RIVER CHASE SD | NC4092056 | 95 | GW |
| RIVERVIEW ESTATES | NC0392278 | 94 | GW |
| ROUNDTREE S/D | NC0392219 | 88 | GW |
| WESLEY WOODS | NC0392337 | 87 | GW |
| KENWOOD MEADOWS S/D | NC4392111 | 86 | GW |
| SQUIRE ESTATES S/D | NC0392308 | 84 | GW |
| BLOOMFIELD ESTATES | NC4092201 | 84 | GW |
| PINEVIEW ESTATES | NC0392177 | 83 | GW |
| JEFFERSON HILL S/D | NC4092031 | 81 | GW |
| BIRCH FALLS S/D | NC0392325 | 76 | GW |
| DUXFORD S/D | NC4392116 | 76 | GW |
| WATKIN`S MHP | NC0392202 | 74 | GW |
| WILLOW CREEK S/D | NC0392230 | 74 | GW |
| WETHERBURN WOODS | NC0392086 | 73 | GW |
| MILLSTONE LANDING S/D | NC4392139 | 73 | GW |
| Forbes Mobile Home Park | MN1690008 | 70 | GW |
| LEONE LANDING | NC4092127 | 69 | GW |
| LAKESIDE ESTATES | NC0392150 | 61 | GW |
| ROYAL ACRES S/D | NC0392186 | 61 | GW |
| COUNTRY RIDGE S/D | NC0392313 | 60 | GW |
| BAILEY`S AT GLENMOOR S/D | NC4092160 | 59 | GW |
| ROLLING ACRES S/D | NC0392247 | 58 | GW |
| HERITAGE SPRING ACRES | NC0392137 | 56 | GW |
| PARRISH MEADOWS S/D | NC0392141 | 55 | GW |
| ARROW SPRINGS | NC0392374 | 53 | GW |
| WILLOW WINDS S/D | NC0392315 | 50 | GW |
| ROLLING MEADOW S/D | NC0392366 | 48 | GW |
| ARLINGTON S/D | NC4092184 | 46 | GW |
| TRINITY FARMS S/D | NC0392274 | 42 | GW |
| RESERVE AT FALLS LAKE (PHASE 4) | NC4092213 | 41 | GW |
| SANCTUARY AT LAKE WHEELER | NC4092207 | 39 | GW |
| FALLS PRESERVE S/D | NC4092088 | 36 | GW |
| FARM ROAD TRAILER PARK | NC0392131 | 28 | GW |
| NORWOOD S/D | NC4092199 | 25 | GW |
How Raleigh compares
Full North Carolina rankings →Raleigh's score of 30.7/100 is below the average of 47/100 among major North Carolina cities. It outscores 1 of 10 nearby cities. 9 of 10 nearby cities score higher.
Nearby cities
View North Carolina rankings →About Raleigh, NC
Wikipedia →Raleigh is the capital city of the U.S. state of North Carolina. It is the second-most populous city in the state, tenth most populous city in the Southeast, the largest city in the Research Triangle area, and the 39th-most populous city in the U.S. Known as the "City of Oaks" for its oak-lined streets, Raleigh covers 148.54 square miles (384.7 km2) and had a population of 467,665 at the 2020 census. It is the county seat of Wake County and is named after Sir Walter Raleigh, who founded the lost Roanoke Colony.
Learn more about your water
Guides and resources related to Raleigh's water quality findings.
Explore water quality across Wake
Frequently asked questions
Is Raleigh, NC tap water safe to drink?
Raleigh's water quality earned a grade of F (30.7/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #416 out of 417 cities tested in North Carolina.
What contaminants are in Raleigh's water?
Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). 10 PFAS compounds were detected. 3207 violations are on record.
How is Raleigh's water quality grade calculated?
The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.
Do I need a water filter in Raleigh?
PFAS compounds exceed EPA limits — a reverse osmosis or activated carbon filter is recommended.
Where does Raleigh's water come from?
Raleigh's water is sourced from Surface water. The city has 96 water systems serving approximately 675,724 residents.
What health violations has Raleigh's water system had?
Raleigh has 241 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in December 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 584 violations remain unresolved.
Why does Raleigh have so many PFAS compounds in its water?
10 different PFAS "forever chemical" compounds were detected in Raleigh's water supply during UCMR 5 testing. PFAS contamination often originates from proximity to military installations (AFFF firefighting foam), airports, industrial manufacturing sites, or wastewater treatment facilities. Some levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels — a reverse osmosis or NSF-certified activated carbon filter is strongly recommended.
How does Raleigh's water compare to other cities?
Raleigh ranks #416 out of 417 cities in North Carolina (better than 0% of state cities) and #15678 out of 15744 cities nationally (0th percentile). The grade of F reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.