WaterVerge

Is Fort Irwin, CA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B+ — but Perchlorate, Vanadium and 2 more were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓

16K residents served 1 water system PWSID: CA3610705
Overall Score
83.5 / 100
Violations
2 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Groundwater
#301 of 694 in California Top 41% nationally
Federal
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
B+GRADE
Water Quality Grade
83.5/100
waterverge.com
B+ 83.5/100

Fort Irwin, CA — Water Quality Report

Fort Irwin's drinking water received a grade of B+ (83.5 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 15,701 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 1 PFAS compound in the water supply.

The system has 62 violations on record, including 60 health-based violations. 2 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Fort Irwin's water

Fort Irwin ranks #301 out of 694 cities in California for water quality, placing it mid-range in the state.

Fort Irwin relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter.

Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 5.90 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
83.5 out of 100 Grade B+
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
34.2/45
B
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
20/20
A
Lead at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
14.3/20
C
1 PFAS compound detected.
Compliance
10/10
A
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
5/5
A
Water source: Groundwater.
Water Safety

Is Fort Irwin, CA water safe to drink?

Use Caution

Fort Irwin's tap water meets most EPA standards but has areas that warrant attention. With a grade of B+ (83.5/100), some contaminant levels or compliance issues suggest that residents may benefit from additional filtration. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 15,701 residents using groundwater (wells).

2
Active Violations
0.0 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
1 compound
PFAS Detected
10 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Fort Irwin

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

PFAS
1 PFAS "forever chemical" compound detected

Detected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Fort Irwin's water quality assessment. Grade: B+ (83.5/100).

Disaster
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3592). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Disaster
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, AND MUDSLIDES

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3591). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.

Violation
2 drinking water violations recorded

2 health-based. Contaminants: Fluoride, Arsenic.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Fort Irwin's water supply.

Lead Within Limits
Detected: 0.0 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Well within EPA limits.

PFAS (1 compound) Elevated
Detected: Highest: lithium at 11.0000 µg/L Limit: 0.004 µg/L (EPA MCL)

Detected but within current EPA limits. PFAS do not break down in the environment and can accumulate in the body over time. An activated carbon filter can reduce exposure.

Chromium-6 (Hexavalent Chromium) Elevated
Detected: 5.90 µg/L Limit: 10 µg/L (California MCL — no federal limit)

The "Erin Brockovich" chemical. There is no federal MCL, but California has set a limit of 10 µg/L. Reverse osmosis filtration is effective at removing hexavalent chromium.

Violation history

Fort Irwin's water system has 62 total violations on record, including 60 health-based violations. 2 remain unresolved.

MRMCL
Most recent violations:
Oct 2017 Lead and Copper Rule Open
Apr 2016 Fluoride Resolved
Apr 2016 Arsenic Resolved
Jan 2016 Arsenic Resolved
Jan 2016 Fluoride Resolved

Flood & environmental risk

San Bernardino County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1980. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies.

SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES
Flood FEMA DR-3592
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, AND MUDSLIDES
Flood FEMA DR-3591
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, AND DEBRIS AND MUD FLOWS
Flood FEMA DR-1952

Where does Fort Irwin's water come from?

Fort Irwin's drinking water comes from groundwater (wells), supplied by 1 water system serving approximately 15,701 people. Groundwater is generally less susceptible to surface contamination but can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate.

What Fort Irwin residents can do

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Monitor alerts during storms

Fort Irwin's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
0.0 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 0% of limit
Safe Level
lithium
PFAS / Forever Chemical
Near MCL
11.0000 µg/L
EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L · +20% over limit
Detected
HAA5 (Disinfection Byproducts)
Disinfection Byproduct
Safe
1.6 µg/L
EPA MCL: 60 µg/L · 3% of limit
Within LimitUCMR 4 DataHAA6Br: 1.9 µg/LHAA9: 2.1 µg/L
Chromium-6 (Hexavalent Chromium)
Inorganic
Elevated
5.90 µg/L
CA MCL (no federal MCL): 10 µg/L · 59% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Strontium
Inorganic
Detected
710.0 µg/L
EPA Health Ref Level: 1,500 µg/L · 47% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Manganese
Inorganic
Detected
1.4 µg/L
EPA Secondary MCL: 50 µg/L · 3% of limit
DetectedUCMR 4 Data
Perchlorate
Inorganic
Over CA MCL
9.70 µg/L
CA MCL (no federal MCL): 6 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over CA MCLUCMR 1 Data (2001–2005)
Vanadium
Inorganic
Over HA
51.00 µg/L
EPA Short-term HA: 21 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over Health AdvisoryUCMR 3 Data
Chlorate
Disinfection Byproduct
Over HA
630.0 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 210 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over Health AdvisoryUCMR 3 Data
Molybdenum
Inorganic
Over HA
59.00 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 40 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over Health AdvisoryUCMR 3 Data
Lithium
Inorganic
Detected
11.0 µg/L
State screening level: 60 µg/L · 18% of limit
DetectedNo federal MCLUCMR 5 Data (2023–2025)
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
1
Detected
0
Exceed EPA MCL
Compliance Record

Violation summary

62
Total violations
60
Health-based
2
Active / unresolved
Oct 2017
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

62 Total
2 Active
60 Health-based
60 Resolved
Violations by category
Arsenic Rule
41
Inorganic Chemicals
19
Lead and Copper Rule
1
Oct 2017 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Active
Compliance Violation
Monitoring 0
Apr 2016 Resolved
Fluoride
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Jun 2016
Apr 2016 Resolved
Arsenic
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Jun 2016
Jan 2016 Resolved
Arsenic
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Mar 2016
Jan 2016 Resolved
Fluoride
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Mar 2016
Oct 2015 Resolved
Fluoride
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Dec 2015
Oct 2015 Resolved
Arsenic
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Dec 2015
Jul 2015 Resolved
Arsenic
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Sep 2015
Jul 2015 Resolved
Fluoride
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Sep 2015
Apr 2015 Resolved
Fluoride
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Jun 2015
Apr 2015 Resolved
Arsenic
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Jun 2015
Jan 2015 Resolved
Arsenic
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Mar 2015
Jan 2015 Resolved
Fluoride
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Mar 2015
Oct 2014 Resolved
Fluoride
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Dec 2014
Oct 2014 Resolved
Arsenic
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Dec 2014
Jul 2014 Resolved
Arsenic
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Sep 2014
Jul 2014 Resolved
Fluoride
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Sep 2014
Apr 2014 Resolved
Arsenic
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Jun 2014
Apr 2014 Resolved
Fluoride
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Jun 2014
Showing 20 of 62 violations
Industrial pollution

Top industrial polluters within 10 miles of Fort Irwin

Industrial polluters nearby

Reported releases to surface water by facilities near Fort Irwin, ranked by pounds discharged annually.

FacilityTop chemicalTo surface water (lbs/yr)Distance
US ARMY FORT IRWIN NATIONAL TRAINING CENTER
Other · US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
FORT IRWIN, CA923105085
1.2 mi

Source: EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) 2023

Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D1 — moderate drought

San Bernardino County is currently in D1 (moderate drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

50.7%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

10
Declared disasters
Mar 2023
Most recent
Flood
Most common type

San Bernardino County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1980. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Mar 2023
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES
Flood FEMA #3592
Jan 2023
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, AND MUDSLIDES
Flood FEMA #3591
Jan 2011
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, AND DEBRIS AND MUD FLOWS
Flood FEMA #1952
Sep 2005
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION
Hurricane FEMA #3248
Feb 1993
SEVERE WINTER STORM, MUD & LAND SLIDES, & FLOODING
Flood FEMA #979
Feb 1992
RAIN/SNOW/WIND STORMS, FLOODING, MUDSLIDES
Flood FEMA #935

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in Fort Irwin's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🧪
For PFAS
Reverse Osmosis or Activated Carbon Block
1 PFAS compound detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 11.000 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has decreased by 0.0 ppb from 1993 (0.0 ppb) to 2024 (0.0 ppb).
Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Groundwater
Operator
Federal
Population Served
15,701
Water Systems
1
Water Source

Where Fort Irwin's water comes from

Groundwater

Fort Irwin's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals.

Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds.

The system is operated by federal ownership and serves approximately 15,701 people through 1 water system.

Infrastructure

Water systems serving Fort Irwin

System Name PWSID Population Source
US ARMY FORT IRWIN CA3610705 15,701 GW
Regional Comparison

How Fort Irwin compares

Full California rankings →

Fort Irwin's score of 83.5/100 is above the average of 57/100 among major California cities. It outscores 8 of 10 nearby cities.

Fort Irwin (this city)
83.5
Oakland
77.9
San Diego
39.7
Sacramento
31.2
California avg
57
City Profile

About Fort Irwin, CA

Wikipedia →

Fort Irwin National Training Center is a major training area for the United States military in the Mojave Desert in northern San Bernardino County, California. Fort Irwin is at an average elevation of 2,454 feet (748 m). It is located 37 miles (60 km) northeast of Barstow, in the Calico Mountains.

Economic Profile
$63,369
Median Income
$1,483/mo
Median Rent
15.4%
Unemployment
Community
23.1
Median Age
497
People / sq mi
28.9%
College Educated
1.5%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Fort Irwin, CA tap water safe to drink?

Fort Irwin's water quality earned a grade of B+ (83.5/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #301 out of 694 cities tested in California.

What contaminants are in Fort Irwin's water?

Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). 1 PFAS compound was detected. 62 violations are on record.

How is Fort Irwin's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Fort Irwin?

PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does Fort Irwin's water come from?

Fort Irwin's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 15,701 residents.

What health violations has Fort Irwin's water system had?

Fort Irwin has 60 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in October 2017. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 2 violations remain unresolved.

Is Fort Irwin's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Fort Irwin uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 62 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Fort Irwin's water compare to other cities?

Fort Irwin ranks #301 out of 694 cities in California (better than 57% of state cities) and #6375 out of 15744 cities nationally (60th percentile). The grade of B+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.