WaterVerge

Is Cottonwood, AZ Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded D — but Chromium-6 was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓

21K residents served 10 water systems PWSID: AZ0413025
Overall Score
45.4 / 100
Violations
106 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Groundwater
#244 of 292 in Arizona Top 90% nationally
Private
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
DGRADE
Water Quality Grade
45.4/100
waterverge.com
D 45.4/100

Cottonwood, AZ — Water Quality Report

Cottonwood's drinking water received a grade of D (45.4 out of 100), indicating poor water quality. The city's 10 water systems serve approximately 20,798 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 2 PFAS compounds in the water supply.

The system has 1704 violations on record, including 184 health-based violations. 106 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Cottonwood's water

Cottonwood ranks #244 out of 292 cities in Arizona for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state.

Cottonwood relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter.

Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 12.00 µg/L, above California's 10 µg/L limit. There is no federal MCL, but the EPA is reviewing evidence linking long-term exposure to cancer risk.

The system has seen 45 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
45.4 out of 100 Grade D
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
0/45
F
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
20/20
A
Lead at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
12.4/20
C
2 PFAS compounds detected.
Compliance
8/10
B
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
5/5
A
Water source: Groundwater.
Water Safety

Is Cottonwood, AZ water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

Cottonwood's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of D (45.4/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 10 water systems serve approximately 20,798 residents using groundwater (wells).

106
Active Violations
0.0 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
2 compounds
PFAS Detected
6 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Cottonwood

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

PFAS
2 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detected

Detected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Cottonwood's water quality assessment. Grade: D (45.4/100).

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.

Violation
22 drinking water violations recorded

1 health-based. Contaminants: CHLOROBENZENE, Carbon tetrachloride, Ethylbenzene.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

1 health-based. Contaminants: Arsenic.

Disaster
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3241). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Cottonwood's water supply.

Lead Within Limits
Detected: 0.0 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Well within EPA limits.

PFAS (2 compounds) Elevated
Detected: Highest: lithium at 59.0000 µg/L Limit: 0.004 µg/L (EPA MCL)

Detected but within current EPA limits. PFAS do not break down in the environment and can accumulate in the body over time. An activated carbon filter can reduce exposure.

Chromium-6 (Hexavalent Chromium) Exceeds Limit
Detected: 12.00 µg/L Limit: 10 µg/L (California MCL — no federal limit)

The "Erin Brockovich" chemical. There is no federal MCL, but California has set a limit of 10 µg/L. Reverse osmosis filtration is effective at removing hexavalent chromium.

PFAS "forever chemicals" detected

UCMR 5 testing found 2 PFAS compounds in Cottonwood's water supply. PFAS are synthetic chemicals that persist indefinitely in the environment and the human body.

Compound Level EPA MCL Status
lithium 59.0000 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
PFPeA 0.0032 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit

Violation history

Cottonwood's water system has 1,704 total violations on record, including 184 health-based violations. 106 remain unresolved. 45 violations were issued in the last 5 years.

MONMRMCLOtherRPT
Most recent violations:
Dec 2025 Revised Total Coliform Rule Resolved
Oct 2025 CHLOROBENZENE Resolved
Oct 2025 Carbon tetrachloride Resolved
Oct 2025 Ethylbenzene Resolved
Oct 2025 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene Resolved

Flood & environmental risk

Yavapai County has experienced 6 federally declared disasters since 1978. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Sycamore Creek Above Verde Rvr,, Verde River, Oak Creek, Verde River Above Camp Verde.

HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION
Hurricane FEMA DR-3241
SEVERE STORMS, TORNADOES & FLOODING
Flood FEMA DR-977
SEVERE STORMS & FLOODING
Flood FEMA DR-884

Where does Cottonwood's water come from?

Cottonwood's drinking water comes from groundwater (wells), supplied by 10 water systems serving approximately 20,798 people. Groundwater is generally less susceptible to surface contamination but can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate. Nearby water bodies include Sycamore Creek Above Verde Rvr, (river), Verde River (river), Oak Creek (river), Verde River Above Camp Verde (river).

What Cottonwood residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: Reverse osmosis system. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Cottonwood's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Monitor alerts during storms

Cottonwood's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
0.0 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 0% of limit
Safe Level
lithium
PFAS / Forever Chemical
Near MCL
59.0000 µg/L
EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L · +20% over limit
Detected
HAA5 (Disinfection Byproducts)
Disinfection Byproduct
Safe
0.6 µg/L
EPA MCL: 60 µg/L · 1% of limit
Within LimitUCMR 4 DataHAA6Br: 0.7 µg/LHAA9: 0.8 µg/L
Chromium-6 (Hexavalent Chromium)
Inorganic
Over CA Limit
12.00 µg/L
CA MCL (no federal MCL): 10 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over CA MCLUCMR 3 Data
Strontium
Inorganic
Detected
590.0 µg/L
EPA Health Ref Level: 1,500 µg/L · 39% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Manganese
Inorganic
Elevated
36.0 µg/L
EPA Secondary MCL: 50 µg/L · 72% of limit
DetectedUCMR 4 Data
Vanadium
Inorganic
Elevated
12.00 µg/L
EPA Short-term HA: 21 µg/L · 57% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Chlorate
Disinfection Byproduct
Elevated
130.0 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 210 µg/L · 62% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Molybdenum
Inorganic
Detected
2.10 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 40 µg/L · 5% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Lithium
Inorganic
Detected
59.0 µg/L
State screening level: 60 µg/L · 98% of limit
DetectedNo federal MCLUCMR 5 Data (2023–2025)
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
2
Detected
0
Exceed EPA MCL
Compliance Record

Violation summary

1704
Total violations
184
Health-based
106
Active / unresolved
Dec 2025
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

1704 Total
106 Active
184 Health-based
1598 Resolved
4 SNC
Violations by category
Synthetic Organic Chemicals
529
Volatile Organic Chemicals
341
Arsenic Rule
279
Inorganic Chemicals
180
Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
112
Jan 2025 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2023 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2023 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2022 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
May 2022 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2021 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Sep 2021 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
May 2020 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2019 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2019 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Apr 2018 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2017 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2017 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2017 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2017 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Jul 2017 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Dec 2016 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Dec 2016 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Dec 2016 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Dec 2016 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Showing 20 of 1704 violations
Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D2 — severe drought

Yavapai County is currently in D2 (severe drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

3
Weeks at D2+ (current streak)
44.5%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)
3
Weeks at D2+ (last 5y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

6
Declared disasters
Sep 2005
Most recent
Flood
Most common type

Yavapai County has experienced 6 federally declared disasters since 1978. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Sep 2005
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION
Hurricane FEMA #3241
Jan 1993
SEVERE STORMS, TORNADOES & FLOODING
Flood FEMA #977
Dec 1990
SEVERE STORMS & FLOODING
Flood FEMA #884
Oct 1983
SEVERE STORMS & FLOODING
Flood FEMA #691
Feb 1980
SEVERE STORMS & FLOODING
Flood FEMA #614
Mar 1978
SEVERE STORMS & FLOODING
Flood FEMA #551

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in Cottonwood's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🧪
For PFAS
Reverse Osmosis or Activated Carbon Block
2 PFAS compounds detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 59.000 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA 0.003 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has increased by 1.7 ppb from 1992 (2.5 ppb) to 2025 (4.2 ppb).
Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Groundwater
Operator
Private
Population Served
20,798
Water Systems
10
Water Source

Where Cottonwood's water comes from

Groundwater

Cottonwood's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals.

Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds.

The system is operated by private ownership and serves approximately 20,798 people through 10 water systems.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near Cottonwood

Cottonwood is located near 4 notable water bodies. These water bodies contribute to the regional watershed and may indirectly affect groundwater quality.

Sycamore Creek Above Verde Rvr,
river
Verde River
river
Oak Creek
river
Verde River Above Camp Verde
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving Cottonwood

System Name PWSID Population Source
COTTONWOOD MUNICIPAL WATER CW1 AZ0413025 11,023 GW
COTTONWOOD MUNICIPAL WATER VV6 AZ0413106 4,509 GW
COTTONWOOD MUNICIPAL WATER VV2 AZ0413104 2,893 GW
COTTONWOOD MUNICIPAL WATER VV3 AZ0413105 1,458 GW
VERDE VALLEY MANOR AZ0413127 275 GW
Cottonwood Day School BIA NN0435004 185 GW
ON THE GREENS AZ0413268 173 GW
ACME WATER - BLUE HILLS AZ0413055 138 GW
RIO VERDE RV PARK AZ0413425 90 GW
C-OASIS PARK AZ0413423 54 GW
Regional Comparison

How Cottonwood compares

Full Arizona rankings →

Cottonwood's score of 45.4/100 is on par with the average of 42/100 among major Arizona cities. It outscores 9 of 10 nearby cities.

Cottonwood (this city)
45.4
Phoenix
37.5
Tucson
38.1
Mesa
40.6
Chandler
40.5
Gilbert
34.8
Arizona avg
42
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Cottonwood, AZ tap water safe to drink?

Cottonwood's water quality earned a grade of D (45.4/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #244 out of 292 cities tested in Arizona.

What contaminants are in Cottonwood's water?

Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). 2 PFAS compounds were detected. 1704 violations are on record.

How is Cottonwood's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Cottonwood?

PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does Cottonwood's water come from?

Cottonwood's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 10 water systems serving approximately 20,798 residents.

What health violations has Cottonwood's water system had?

Cottonwood has 184 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in December 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 106 violations remain unresolved.

Is Cottonwood's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Cottonwood uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 1704 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Cottonwood's water compare to other cities?

Cottonwood ranks #244 out of 292 cities in Arizona (better than 16% of state cities) and #14161 out of 15744 cities nationally (10th percentile). The grade of D reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.