WaterVerge

Is Smithtown (T), NY Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded C — but 1,4-Dioxane, Manganese and 3 more were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓

1.1M residents served 4 water systems PWSID: NY5110526
Overall Score
60.9 / 100
Violations
10 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Groundwater
#751 of 855 in New York Top 77% nationally
Local Government
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
CGRADE
Water Quality Grade
60.9/100
waterverge.com
C 60.9/100

Smithtown (T), NY — Water Quality Report

Smithtown (T)'s drinking water received a grade of C (60.9 out of 100), indicating fair water quality. The city's 4 water systems serve approximately 1,105,797 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 1.3 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 10 PFAS compounds, with levels exceeding EPA maximum contaminant levels in the water supply.

The system has 95 violations on record, including 3 health-based violations. 10 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Smithtown (T)'s water

Smithtown (T) ranks #751 out of 855 cities in New York for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state.

Smithtown (T) relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

Of particular concern: PFAS "forever chemical" levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels. These synthetic compounds don't break down naturally and require specialized filtration such as reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon.

Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 5.59 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.

As a major metropolitan system serving over 1.1M residents, Smithtown (T) faces large-scale infrastructure challenges including aging pipes and the complexity of treating water across a vast distribution network.

The system has seen 31 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
60.9 out of 100 Grade C
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
19/45
F
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
20/20
A
Lead at 1.3 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
8.8/20
F
10 PFAS compounds detected.
Compliance
8/10
B
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
5/5
A
Water source: Groundwater.
Water Safety

Is Smithtown (T), NY water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

Smithtown (T)'s drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of C (60.9/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 4 water systems serve approximately 1,105,797 residents using groundwater (wells).

10
Active Violations
1.3 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
10 compounds
PFAS Detected
10 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Smithtown (T)

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

PFAS
10 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detected

PFAS levels exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or activated carbon filtration recommended.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Smithtown (T)'s water quality assessment. Grade: C (60.9/100).

Violation
28 drinking water violations recorded

Contaminants: Endrin, BHC-GAMMA, Methoxychlor.

Violation
2 drinking water violations recorded

Contaminants: Radium-226, Radium-228.

Disaster
REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4615). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Disaster
REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3572). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Smithtown (T)'s water supply.

Lead Within Limits
Detected: 1.3 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Well within EPA limits.

PFAS (10 compounds) Elevated
Detected: Highest: PFBA at 0.1225 µg/L Limit: 0.004 µg/L (EPA MCL)

PFAS "forever chemicals" exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon filtration strongly recommended.

Chromium-6 (Hexavalent Chromium) Elevated
Detected: 5.59 µg/L Limit: 10 µg/L (California MCL — no federal limit)

The "Erin Brockovich" chemical. There is no federal MCL, but California has set a limit of 10 µg/L. Reverse osmosis filtration is effective at removing hexavalent chromium.

PFAS "forever chemicals" detected

UCMR 5 testing found 10 PFAS compounds in Smithtown (T)'s water supply. PFAS are synthetic chemicals that persist indefinitely in the environment and the human body.

Compound Level EPA MCL Status
PFBA 0.1225 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
PFHxA 0.0435 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
PFPeA 0.0394 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
6:2 FTS 0.0236 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit

Violation history

Smithtown (T)'s water system has 95 total violations on record, including 3 health-based violations. 10 remain unresolved. 31 violations were issued in the last 5 years.

MRMCLMONOther
Most recent violations:
Jan 2023 Endrin Resolved
Jan 2023 BHC-GAMMA Resolved
Jan 2023 Methoxychlor Resolved
Jan 2023 Toxaphene Resolved
Jan 2023 Simazine Resolved

Flood & environmental risk

Suffolk County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1999. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Connetquot Bk Nr Central Islip, Carlls River.

REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA
Hurricane FEMA DR-4615
REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA
Hurricane FEMA DR-3572
HURRICANE HENRI
Hurricane FEMA DR-3565

Where does Smithtown (T)'s water come from?

Smithtown (T)'s drinking water comes from groundwater (wells), supplied by 4 water systems serving approximately 1,105,797 people. Groundwater is generally less susceptible to surface contamination but can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate. Nearby water bodies include Connetquot Bk Nr Central Islip (river), Carlls River (river).

What Smithtown (T) residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: Reverse osmosis system. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Smithtown (T)'s water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Monitor alerts during storms

Smithtown (T)'s area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
1.3 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 8% of limit
Safe Level
PFBA
PFAS / Forever Chemical
Near MCL
0.1225 µg/L
EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L · +20% over limit
Detected
HAA5 (Disinfection Byproducts)
Disinfection Byproduct
Safe
1.6 µg/L
EPA MCL: 60 µg/L · 3% of limit
Within LimitUCMR 4 DataHAA6Br: 1.6 µg/LHAA9: 2.8 µg/L
Chromium-6 (Hexavalent Chromium)
Inorganic
Elevated
5.59 µg/L
CA MCL (no federal MCL): 10 µg/L · 56% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Strontium
Inorganic
Detected
169.0 µg/L
EPA Health Ref Level: 1,500 µg/L · 11% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
1,4-Dioxane
Organic
Over HA
4.34 µg/L
EPA Health Advisory: 0.35 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over Health AdvisoryUCMR 3 Data
Manganese
Inorganic
Over SMCL
176.8 µg/L
EPA Secondary MCL: 50 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over SMCLUCMR 4 Data
NDMA (N-Nitrosodimethylamine)
Disinfection Byproduct
Over CA PHG
13.4 ng/L
CA Public Health Goal: 10 ng/L · +20% over limit
Over CA PHGProbable CarcinogenUCMR 2 Data (2008–2010)
Perchlorate
Inorganic
Over CA MCL
12.10 µg/L
CA MCL (no federal MCL): 6 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over CA MCLUCMR 1 Data (2001–2005)
Vanadium
Inorganic
Detected
6.97 µg/L
EPA Short-term HA: 21 µg/L · 33% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Chlorate
Disinfection Byproduct
Over HA
386.0 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 210 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over Health AdvisoryUCMR 3 Data
Molybdenum
Inorganic
Detected
1.18 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 40 µg/L · 3% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Cobalt
Inorganic
Detected
7.49 µg/L
No federal limit: N/A µg/L · 50% of limit
DetectedNo federal MCLUCMR 3 Data
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
10
Detected
2
Exceed EPA MCL
5.97
Hazard Index
PFOS max: 0.0174 µg/L PFOA max: 0.0065 µg/L
Compliance Record

Violation summary

95
Total violations
3
Health-based
10
Active / unresolved
Jan 2023
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

95 Total
10 Active
3 Health-based
85 Resolved
Violations by category
Synthetic Organic Chemicals
62
Total Coliform Rule
6
Miscellaneous Other Rules
6
Lead and Copper Rule
4
Radionuclides and Revised Rad Rule
3
Jan 2015 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2006 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jun 2005 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2004 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 1999 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 1994 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jan 1994 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Active
Compliance Violation
Monitoring 0
Active
Compliance Violation
Monitoring 0
Active
Compliance Violation
Monitoring 0
Jan 2023 Resolved
Endrin
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2023
Jan 2023 Resolved
BHC-GAMMA
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2023
Jan 2023 Resolved
Methoxychlor
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2023
Jan 2023 Resolved
Toxaphene
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2023
Jan 2023 Resolved
Simazine
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2023
Jan 2023 Resolved
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2023
Jan 2023 Resolved
Picloram
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2023
Jan 2023 Resolved
Dinoseb
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2023
Jan 2023 Resolved
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2023
Jan 2023 Resolved
Aldicarb sulfoxide
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2023
Showing 20 of 95 violations
Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D1 — moderate drought

Suffolk County is currently in D1 (moderate drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

25.5%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

10
Declared disasters
Sep 2021
Most recent
Hurricane
Most common type

Suffolk County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1999. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Sep 2021
REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA
Hurricane FEMA #4615
Sep 2021
REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA
Hurricane FEMA #3572
Aug 2021
HURRICANE HENRI
Hurricane FEMA #3565
Oct 2020
TROPICAL STORM ISAIAS
Hurricane FEMA #4567
Oct 2012
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA #4085
Oct 2012
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA #3351

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in Smithtown (T)'s water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🧪
For PFAS
Reverse Osmosis or Activated Carbon Block
PFAS compounds exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 1.3 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS 0.024 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA 0.122 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFBS 0.005 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA 0.010 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA 0.043 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFHxS 0.011 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA 0.006 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFOA 0.006 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFOS 0.017 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFPeA 0.039 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has decreased by 9.9 ppb from 1992 (11.2 ppb) to 2027 (1.3 ppb).
Contaminant Rankings

See how Smithtown (T) compares by contaminant

Explore where Smithtown (T) ranks among all New York cities for specific contaminants.

Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Groundwater
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
1,105,797
Water Systems
4
Water Source

Where Smithtown (T)'s water comes from

Groundwater

Smithtown (T)'s drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals.

Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 1,105,797 people through 4 water systems.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near Smithtown (T)

Smithtown (T) is located near 2 notable water bodies. These water bodies contribute to the regional watershed and may indirectly affect groundwater quality.

Connetquot Bk Nr Central Islip
river
Carlls River
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving Smithtown (T)

System Name PWSID Population Source
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY NY5110526 1,100,000 GW
BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY NY5111891 3,500 GW
SEAVIEW WATER COMPANY NY5110600 1,400 GW
CALVERTON HILLS OWNERS ASSOCIATION NY5112134 897 GW
Regional Comparison

How Smithtown (T) compares

Full New York rankings →

Smithtown (T)'s score of 60.9/100 is below the average of 76/100 among major New York cities. It outscores 1 of 10 nearby cities. 9 of 10 nearby cities score higher.

Smithtown (T) (this city)
60.9
New York avg
76
City Profile

About Smithtown (T), NY

Wikipedia →

Hauppauge is a hamlet and census-designated place (CDP) in the towns of Islip and Smithtown in western Suffolk County, New York, on Long Island. The population was 20,803 at the time of the 2020 census.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Smithtown (T), NY tap water safe to drink?

Smithtown (T)'s water quality earned a grade of C (60.9/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #751 out of 855 cities tested in New York.

What contaminants are in Smithtown (T)'s water?

Lead was measured at 1.3 ppb (90th percentile). 10 PFAS compounds were detected. 95 violations are on record.

How is Smithtown (T)'s water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Smithtown (T)?

PFAS compounds exceed EPA limits — a reverse osmosis or activated carbon filter is recommended.

Where does Smithtown (T)'s water come from?

Smithtown (T)'s water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 4 water systems serving approximately 1,105,797 residents.

What health violations has Smithtown (T)'s water system had?

Smithtown (T) has 3 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in January 2023. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 10 violations remain unresolved.

Is Smithtown (T)'s groundwater at risk of contamination?

Smithtown (T) uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 95 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

Why does Smithtown (T) have so many PFAS compounds in its water?

10 different PFAS "forever chemical" compounds were detected in Smithtown (T)'s water supply during UCMR 5 testing. PFAS contamination often originates from proximity to military installations (AFFF firefighting foam), airports, industrial manufacturing sites, or wastewater treatment facilities. Some levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels — a reverse osmosis or NSF-certified activated carbon filter is strongly recommended.

How does Smithtown (T)'s water compare to other cities?

Smithtown (T) ranks #751 out of 855 cities in New York (better than 12% of state cities) and #12031 out of 15744 cities nationally (24th percentile). The grade of C reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.