WaterVerge

Is Bridgeton, NC Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B+, with 5 unresolved violations on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do next ↓

12K residents served 2 water systems PWSID: NC0425040
Overall Score
81.5 / 100
Violations
5 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Groundwater
#125 of 417 in North Carolina Top 47% nationally
Local Government
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
B+GRADE
Water Quality Grade
81.5/100
waterverge.com
B+ 81.5/100

Bridgeton, NC — Water Quality Report

Bridgeton's drinking water received a grade of B+ (81.5 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 11,839 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 1 PFAS compound in the water supply.

The system has 9 violations on record, including 2 health-based violations. 5 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Bridgeton's water

Bridgeton ranks #125 out of 417 cities in North Carolina for water quality, placing it mid-range in the state.

Bridgeton relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
81.5 out of 100 Grade B+
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
37.7/45
B
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
20/20
A
Lead at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
15.8/20
B
1 PFAS compound detected.
Compliance
3/10
F
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
5/5
A
Water source: Groundwater.
Water Safety

Is Bridgeton, NC water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

Bridgeton's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B+ (81.5/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 11,839 residents using groundwater (wells).

5
Active Violations
0.0 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
1 compound
PFAS Detected
10 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Bridgeton

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

PFAS
1 PFAS "forever chemical" compound detected

Detected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Bridgeton's water quality assessment. Grade: B+ (81.5/100).

Violation
2 drinking water violations recorded

1 health-based. Contaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS.

Disaster
HURRICANE IAN

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3586). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Disaster
HURRICANE ISAIAS

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4568). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

1 health-based. Contaminants: TTHM.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Bridgeton's water supply.

Lead Within Limits
Detected: 0.0 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Well within EPA limits.

PFAS (1 compound) Elevated
Detected: Highest: lithium at 16.6000 µg/L Limit: 0.004 µg/L (EPA MCL)

Detected but within current EPA limits. PFAS do not break down in the environment and can accumulate in the body over time. An activated carbon filter can reduce exposure.

Violation history

Bridgeton's water system has 9 total violations on record, including 2 health-based violations. 5 remain unresolved. 2 violations were issued in the last 5 years.

TTRPTMCLOtherMR
Most recent violations:
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Oct 2020 TTHM Resolved
Jul 2002 Consumer Confidence Rule Open
Jan 1994 Nitrate Resolved

Flood & environmental risk

Craven County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 2011. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Swift Creek.

HURRICANE IAN
Hurricane FEMA DR-3586
HURRICANE ISAIAS
Hurricane FEMA DR-4568
HURRICANE ISAIAS
Hurricane FEMA DR-3534

Where does Bridgeton's water come from?

Bridgeton's drinking water comes from groundwater (wells), supplied by 2 water systems serving approximately 11,839 people. Groundwater is generally less susceptible to surface contamination but can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate. Nearby water bodies include Swift Creek (river).

What Bridgeton residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: Activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Bridgeton's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Monitor alerts during storms

Bridgeton's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
0.0 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 0% of limit
Safe Level
lithium
PFAS / Forever Chemical
Near MCL
16.6000 µg/L
EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L · +20% over limit
Detected
Lithium
Inorganic
Detected
16.6 µg/L
State screening level: 60 µg/L · 28% of limit
DetectedNo federal MCLUCMR 5 Data (2023–2025)
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
1
Detected
0
Exceed EPA MCL
Compliance Record

Violation summary

9
Total violations
2
Health-based
5
Active / unresolved
Oct 2024
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

9 Total
5 Active
2 Health-based
4 Resolved
1 SNC
Violations by category
Lead and Copper Rule Revisions
2
Total Coliform Rule
2
Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
1
Consumer Confidence Rule
1
Nitrate Rule
1
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Jul 2002 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Active
Compliance Violation
Monitoring 0
Active
Compliance Violation
Monitoring 0
Oct 2020 Resolved
TTHM
Max Contaminant Level
SNC Health Resolved Dec 2020
Jan 1994 Resolved
Nitrate
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 1994
Jul 1991 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Jul 1991
Jul 1991 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Jul 1991
Industrial pollution

Top industrial polluters within 10 miles of Bridgeton

Industrial polluters nearby

Reported releases to surface water by facilities near Bridgeton, ranked by pounds discharged annually.

Total reported releases to surface water: 437,579 lbs

FacilityTop chemicalTo surface water (lbs/yr)Distance
INTERNATIONAL PAPER- NEW BERN MILL
Paper · INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
VANCEBORO, NC28586
Methanol437,5798.7 mi
S&W NEW BERN PLANT
Nonmetallic Mineral Product · TITAN AMERICA LLC
NEW BERN, NC28560
Lead00.8 mi
WHITE RIVER MARINE GROUP
Transportation Equipment · BASS PRO GROUP LLC
NEW BERN, NC28560
3.5 mi

Source: EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) 2023

Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D2 — severe drought

Craven County is currently in D2 (severe drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

6
Weeks at D2+ (current streak)
17.2%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)
10
Weeks at D2+ (last 5y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

10
Declared disasters
Oct 2022
Most recent
Hurricane
Most common type

Craven County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 2011. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Oct 2022
HURRICANE IAN
Hurricane FEMA #3586
Oct 2020
HURRICANE ISAIAS
Hurricane FEMA #4568
Aug 2020
HURRICANE ISAIAS
Hurricane FEMA #3534
Oct 2019
HURRICANE DORIAN
Hurricane FEMA #4465
Sep 2019
HURRICANE DORIAN
Hurricane FEMA #3423
Sep 2018
HURRICANE FLORENCE
Hurricane FEMA #4393

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in Bridgeton's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🧪
For PFAS
Reverse Osmosis or Activated Carbon Block
1 PFAS compound detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 16.600 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has decreased by 6.0 ppb from 1992 (11.0 ppb) to 2025 (5.0 ppb).
Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Groundwater
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
11,839
Water Systems
2
Water Source

Where Bridgeton's water comes from

Groundwater

Bridgeton's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals.

Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 11,839 people through 2 water systems.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near Bridgeton

Bridgeton is located near 1 notable water body. These water bodies contribute to the regional watershed and may indirectly affect groundwater quality.

Swift Creek
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving Bridgeton

System Name PWSID Population Source
FIRST CRAVEN SANITARY DISTRICT NC0425040 6,325 GW
FAIRFIELD HARBOUR NC0425132 5,514 GW
Regional Comparison

How Bridgeton compares

Full North Carolina rankings →

Bridgeton's score of 81.5/100 is above the average of 43/100 among major North Carolina cities. It outscores 9 of 10 nearby cities.

Bridgeton (this city)
81.5
Charlotte
36.5
Raleigh
30.7
Durham
36.6
Greensboro
33.5
North Carolina avg
43
City Profile

About Bridgeton, NC

Economic Profile
$48,542
Median Income
$129,478
Median Home Value
$1,080/mo
Median Rent
5%
Unemployment
Community
37.2
Median Age
100
People / sq mi
39.1%
College Educated
70.1%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Bridgeton, NC tap water safe to drink?

Bridgeton's water quality earned a grade of B+ (81.5/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #125 out of 417 cities tested in North Carolina.

What contaminants are in Bridgeton's water?

Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). 1 PFAS compound was detected. 9 violations are on record.

How is Bridgeton's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Bridgeton?

PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does Bridgeton's water come from?

Bridgeton's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 2 water systems serving approximately 11,839 residents.

What health violations has Bridgeton's water system had?

Bridgeton has 2 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in October 2024. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 5 violations remain unresolved.

Is Bridgeton's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Bridgeton uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 9 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Bridgeton's water compare to other cities?

Bridgeton ranks #125 out of 417 cities in North Carolina (better than 70% of state cities) and #7431 out of 15744 cities nationally (53th percentile). The grade of B+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.